Associate
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2010
- Posts
- 2,309
Hi all,
Just acquired my first NAS - a Synology DS214se with 2x6TB WD Reds, I could use a little steer on how best to set it up.....if the answer to any of these depends on it, the main use case will be storing game recordings and edited videos - The bulk of the current stuff will likely be stored on another drive in my main PC, so won't be editing directly from the NAS.
1. SHR vs RAID1 (vs no redundancy?) - What would you pick?
So I have 2 drives, the enclosure only supports 2 drives.... I was considering just making each drive an individual volume and copying files I really cared about to both, but this is probably too much hassle so I think either SHR or RAID1 would be best...
As I understand it, the benefit to SHR would be that if I ever got a bigger enclosure, I could migrate both disks, then add more to increase the volume size, but are there any other benefits beside this (as I think I'm unlikely to upgrade beyond this any time soon)?
For RAID1, I understand it may have slightly better performance, but not to a huge extent and would also be more painful to move/expand in future
I have no idea which would be more reliable
2. a simpler question (I think) - Disks always on, or power down when not being accessed? - not sure whether power on hours or power on count has a bigger impact on longevity, given that I will be likely accessing it fairly infrequently.
Edit- Bonus Q3: I assume I'd be best to just make 1 big storage pool/volume, but is there any benefit to splitting it down?
Thanks in advance!
Just acquired my first NAS - a Synology DS214se with 2x6TB WD Reds, I could use a little steer on how best to set it up.....if the answer to any of these depends on it, the main use case will be storing game recordings and edited videos - The bulk of the current stuff will likely be stored on another drive in my main PC, so won't be editing directly from the NAS.
1. SHR vs RAID1 (vs no redundancy?) - What would you pick?
So I have 2 drives, the enclosure only supports 2 drives.... I was considering just making each drive an individual volume and copying files I really cared about to both, but this is probably too much hassle so I think either SHR or RAID1 would be best...
As I understand it, the benefit to SHR would be that if I ever got a bigger enclosure, I could migrate both disks, then add more to increase the volume size, but are there any other benefits beside this (as I think I'm unlikely to upgrade beyond this any time soon)?
For RAID1, I understand it may have slightly better performance, but not to a huge extent and would also be more painful to move/expand in future
I have no idea which would be more reliable
2. a simpler question (I think) - Disks always on, or power down when not being accessed? - not sure whether power on hours or power on count has a bigger impact on longevity, given that I will be likely accessing it fairly infrequently.
Edit- Bonus Q3: I assume I'd be best to just make 1 big storage pool/volume, but is there any benefit to splitting it down?
Thanks in advance!
Last edited: