Questions from a NAS (/Synology) noob...

Associate
Joined
13 Sep 2010
Posts
2,309
Hi all,

Just acquired my first NAS - a Synology DS214se with 2x6TB WD Reds, I could use a little steer on how best to set it up.....if the answer to any of these depends on it, the main use case will be storing game recordings and edited videos - The bulk of the current stuff will likely be stored on another drive in my main PC, so won't be editing directly from the NAS.

1. SHR vs RAID1 (vs no redundancy?) - What would you pick?
So I have 2 drives, the enclosure only supports 2 drives.... I was considering just making each drive an individual volume and copying files I really cared about to both, but this is probably too much hassle so I think either SHR or RAID1 would be best...
As I understand it, the benefit to SHR would be that if I ever got a bigger enclosure, I could migrate both disks, then add more to increase the volume size, but are there any other benefits beside this (as I think I'm unlikely to upgrade beyond this any time soon)?
For RAID1, I understand it may have slightly better performance, but not to a huge extent and would also be more painful to move/expand in future
I have no idea which would be more reliable

2. a simpler question (I think) - Disks always on, or power down when not being accessed? - not sure whether power on hours or power on count has a bigger impact on longevity, given that I will be likely accessing it fairly infrequently.

Edit- Bonus Q3: I assume I'd be best to just make 1 big storage pool/volume, but is there any benefit to splitting it down?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
@hornetstinger Thanks, yeah I was thinking of possibly having two separate storage pools, one on each disk (AFAIK it can do that!), rather than one combined JBOD, and then manually (or by script) copying files I would be most sensitive to losing to each of them.

I think you're probably right on the power down thing, just wasn't sure as I thought it may be as an example analogous to the argument that a GPU that has been mined on low power settings 24/7 may have suffered less 'stress' than one which was gamed at full power/OC but only in short bursts and therefore gone through many hot/cold cycles.....if that makes sense!
 
Thank you all for your input!

Keep it simple and use RAID1 so you have redundancy without any hassle.
When you say 'without any hassle', do you mean in the event that the enclosure failed that I could recover the data without having to buy another Synology (just plug in to any old motherboard supporting RAID)?
(That seems to be the main upside to using RAID)
If something else, would you mind elaborating a tiny bit more? - From the way Synology describe SHR they're framing it as 'simpler' than RAID for beginners!

In any case, I think you may be right and RAID1 will likely be the best fit for my use :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom