Fstop11 said:I am not famila with the term hard and soft. I would have thought it just refered to density.
King4aDay said:Soft grads are generally more versatile, hard grads are better if you'll be shooting a lot of landscapes with a well-defined horizon.
Agreed. 0.6 soft is what I went for.yak.h'cir said:Seconded!
If you think you'll be photographing lots of hilly backgrounds get soft, if its lots of flat horizons like sea views etc get hard. If its a bit of both soft will prob be your best bet.
The 0.6 strength is probably your best bet to start out with, 0.3 is not really strong enough to use on its own most of the time and 0.9 can be a bit extreme.

Thanks for clearing that up.scoop said:Hard/Soft refers to the transition between the ND and clear parts of the filter; a hard transition is pretty much a straight cut, with 50% of the filer cuttinglight and 50% being clear. A soft grad has a more diffuse border between the two areas so the transition is less marked.
I may be dim for asking, but is 0.6 soft the same as ND4 soft?Joe T said:Agreed. 0.6 soft is what I went for.![]()
scoop said:If I understand this cortrectly, an ND4 is a four stop ND filter. A 0.6ND is a 3-stop filter.
