NZXT Kraken G10 + Kraken X40. Done. Then wait for Vega and price drops. Best option for you imo.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_radeon_rx_480_g1_gaming_review,1.html
The 290x is not in to many of the benches for some reason but it's not much slower than the 390x. They are basically the same chip with the main difference being that the 390x has 1050 core and 1500 memory where as the 290x has 1000 core and 1250 memory. The other main difference is the 390x has 8gb vram compared to a standard 4gb on the 290x. This leads to around a 5-10% performance difference overall according to techpowerup's summary over 20 or so games.
NZXT Kraken G10 + Kraken X40. Done. Then wait for Vega and price drops. Best option for you imo.
Thanks.
I know of the differences. I run my 290x at 1200/1650, so it should compete.
I have basically no trust in AMD pulling through on their latest bit of hype. Continually over-promising and under performing. I hope I am wrong about Vega though.
You have said this in nearly every thread? Where are they under performing? Where did they over promise? The last thing they hyped out of control was bulldozer.
Not due to anything AMD ever said though. The hype was entirely down to "leaks"/made up bullcrap. AMD never claimed that the RX 480 was anything more than a card to meet the minimum VR spec at an affordable price. Which, IMO, they delivered on with the 4GB model at under £200. The 8GB model is too expensive, but then so is Nvidia's alternative. Post-announcement marketing is irrelevant, as they simply needed to be more aggressive in that area to match Nvidia's vast arsenal of half-truths and "hardcore gamer"-focused masturbatory nonsense.Hype level was over 9000!
I am thinking of going for a waterloop which has been a long term interest for me and shoving a block on the 290, hoping this is a good decision and will allow me to push high clocks on the 290 which will bring it to a 970 performance which isnt too far behind the 980 which is good enough to last me until upgrade time when AMD release their new cards.
Now the question is, do I get a 2nd R9 290 or stick with the 1
I wouldn't go waterloop on such an old card. And I definitely wouldn't get a second 290. If you are going to spend that much money on waterblocks and second 290 then you might as well buy a 1070 and sell the 290 you have already.
Remember, your card might be a poor overclocker even with water.
Just buy a cheap air cooler for your 290 if the noise is annoying you and hold off spending until the new AMD cards arrive.
I don't want to be rude, but I think it would be a terrible decision to watercool the 290.
1 with that PSU, you will be pushing it with 2, also you get a lot of people complaining about crossfire and games not being supported.
Personally I'd stick with 1 or change to a better single card!
The PSU requirement is a very good point against CF. Almost draws out the worthiness of getting a 2nd card