Associate
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 340
- Location
- Merseyside.
Hi there ![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/smile.gif)
I have two drives as follows in an Nforce4 chipsetted board (DFI NF4 Infinity) :
300GB PATA 16MB Cache.
300GB SATA 16MB Cache.
Would I see any great, noticable permance benefit in putting both drives in a RAID-0 config or would it be better to install XP on the SATA drive and use the PATA drive as an mp3 store, effectively?
Many thanks!
![Smile :) :)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/smile.gif)
I have two drives as follows in an Nforce4 chipsetted board (DFI NF4 Infinity) :
300GB PATA 16MB Cache.
300GB SATA 16MB Cache.
Would I see any great, noticable permance benefit in putting both drives in a RAID-0 config or would it be better to install XP on the SATA drive and use the PATA drive as an mp3 store, effectively?
Many thanks!