Soldato
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 6,606
- Location
- Sydney Australia
I really do wonder at the use of heat spreaders on DDR ram. I have heard the comments that heat on memory can cause errors and the such but have never seen anyone testing this statement.
So, my question is, does RAM really require heatspreaders and if so, where is the proof?
I have only found a couple of articles regarding this subject on Google:
http://www.overclockercafe.com/Reviews/other_misc/Artic Silver Adhesive/artic silver.html
http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=712
and also found this extract from one of the FAQs from OcUK.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=53160
"Q. Do heatspreaders make a difference, should I add them?
A: In RDRAM heatspreaders are absolute requirements, in DDR all chips do equivalent work when processing a command. Heatspreaders are little more than a cosmetic improvement."
But again, is there any conclusive proof, and what about VGA card memory?
So, my question is, does RAM really require heatspreaders and if so, where is the proof?
I have only found a couple of articles regarding this subject on Google:
http://www.overclockercafe.com/Reviews/other_misc/Artic Silver Adhesive/artic silver.html
http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=712
and also found this extract from one of the FAQs from OcUK.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=53160
"Q. Do heatspreaders make a difference, should I add them?
A: In RDRAM heatspreaders are absolute requirements, in DDR all chips do equivalent work when processing a command. Heatspreaders are little more than a cosmetic improvement."
But again, is there any conclusive proof, and what about VGA card memory?