Rate the sig above thread.

Muban - 9/10 as always :)


joeyjojo said:
"If no images are used then up to 4 consecutive lines of normal or smaller text is permitted"

:D

Like it Rai. I would pump the contrast a little bit if I was you. A la:


But he does have an image, a tiny little .Gif :o

Upping the contrast might work, but there are loads of Jpeg artefacts in that one.
 
G-MAN2004 said:
You must have bad eye sight. I can read that sitting 2-3 feet away.

I'm sat atleast 3-4 feet away and struggling on 1280x1024 even though my eyes are fine, however I am somewhat tired.

Yours, I like, 9/10
 
Last edited:
WotDa said:
Hard to read, text is too small, and you used a cheap mans transparency. ;)

6/10
i didn't use the lazy mans way of a sig [transparency] lol...
:)
i actually found the colour number and used it as the background! lol.

cheers for the high ratings lads! :D
 
tem07 said:
i didn't use the lazy mans way of a sig [transparency] lol...
:)

Yes you did! Real men use proper transparency and then wonder why the text looks crap. ;)

Heres the best example I could find quickly....

Popout_squirrel.png


Edit: My word, that brings back memories. :(
 
WotDa said:
Yes you did! Real men use proper transparency and then wonder why the text looks crap. ;)

Heres the best example I could find quickly....

Popout_squirrel.png

Here's a 7 :)

edit: but it's rotating! The one I am seeing now isn't that nice :p
 
hardc0re_tid said:
nice, simple and effecive
Like it tid, made me lol anyway :)

Thanks muban will take it out I think :)

tem07 he's referring to you using the background colour as apposed to proper transparency (ie. a png)
 
pyro said:
Here's a 7 :)

edit: but it's rotating! The one I am seeing now isn't that nice :p

What one for? :p No it doesn't rotate, lol!

I'll be honest, I hated your old one enough to block it, however your new one is nice, 7 :)
 
WotDa said:
What one for? :p No it doesn't rotate, lol!

I'll be honest, I hated your old one enough to block it, however your new one is nice, 7 :)

Right, it doesn't, I don't know how I got confused there :o
 
pyro said:
Right, it doesn't, I don't know how I got confused there :o

;) I have tried to add the back catalog into a rotating one, but its not worked very well, might try with my new host... :o
 
joeyjojo said:
Like it tid, made me lol anyway :)

Thanks muban will take it out I think :)

tem07 he's referring to you using the background colour as apposed to proper transparency (ie. a png)
in that case then, i didn't use a transparent image cos there might be some old school ie users in which the internet explorer doesen't support transparent pngs. :)
 
tem07 said:
in that case then, i didn't use a transparent image cos there might be some old school ie users in which the internet explorer doesen't support transparent pngs. :)

Use a transparent gif. ;)

squffer.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom