Real, or CGI?

[Akira]

there's no trace of HDR treatment there

Whatever. They've been visually exaggerated.

 

[Bennah]

What ever they are, it looks great!

Look at those brakes

 

[MrSix]

A lot of those look like they have had extensive post work done to kill uneven reflections.
Nice photographs though.

 

[G_D]

I thought the last 8 or 9 were fake because there are a lot of shots like that which Ferrari also do that often come out before any real shots which i have been told before are fake?

The rest are all 'real' in the sense that they were least taken by a man with a camera but to call most shots 'real' these days is another thing. They all look to me like have had plenty of touch up work. (that or someone came out with a Hoover and some polish 1st and went to work on the tarmac)

 

[olv]

Whatever. They've been visually exaggerated.

haha, i love how 'HDR' is just thrown in now as a buzz word to describe any well lit photograph.

 

[milkinc13]

all look real to me

 

[Mat]

Real, with a side salad of Photoshop.

 

[Dogbreath]

haha, i love how 'HDR' is just thrown in now as a buzz word to describe any well lit photograph.

It's not a buzz word, it's a buzz acronym

I can see why people could think they are rendered, the cars appear to be absolutely flawless, not a spec of dirt or an odd reflection anywhere which gives them an "unreal" appearance.

 

[Lashout_UK]

That's exactly what I said in the other discussion!

The haters are well and truly silenced now