TheVoice said:
A P3 will be 'nippy'? Even modern Celeron notebooks are quite sluggish, so a P3 isn't going to be any better!
Yes, I do happen to have 3 P-III computers at home.
In fact, I'll list out the comps, so I can demostrate that I know what a 'nippy' computer is:
- P-III 500Mhz, 40GB 7200rpm drive 448MB RAM, Windows XP Home
- P-III 733Mhz, 40GB 7200rpm drive, 256MB RAM, Windows 2000 Pro
- AMD 3500+ AM2, 80GB 7200rpm drive, 1GB RAM, Windows 2000 Pro
- P-M 2.0Ghz Dothan, 40GB 5400rpm drive, 768MB RAM, Windows XP
(can't be bothered with some of the rest, but then my desktop)
C2D E6400, ASUS P5N-E (to be replaced), 2GB RAM, 4x 73.4GB 10000 RPM SAS 2.5" drives RAID5, 4x 320GB Seagate 7200.10 RAID5, Windows XP Pro.
As you can see, my desktop absolutely rips the others apart, yet, if I am objective, running windows daily is not really
that much quicker than faster than the P-III 500Mhz which actually is running XP on a Geforce 2 or something (can't remember exactly).
So long as you have enough RAM, any old computer up to P-III (I would say P-II's and older don't really perform due to not featuring certain prefetches [I believe]) with a 7200rpm drive can and does perform just fine.
Celeron notebooks are sluggish because of the lack of RAM and the heavily crippled cache and the fact they often use 4200rpm and at best 5400rpm drives. A 7200rpm drive in a laptop, even a very old one, will perform well.
P-III's are still nippy when coupled with the right hardware.
Of course, my argument can fall flat on it's face IF the laptop in question doesn't have at least an ATA-66 BUS...
