Richard dawkins

NormanPorkinson · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:30

What a breath of fresh air this man is in a world full of madness and irrationality!

Such a humble and polite, well spoken ambassador of reason and thought, with the intellect of a man with 3 heads. His arguments are so articulate and well delivered, he really makes me proud to be British!

What a world we would live in if everyone could reason like this man! A national treasure and I'm happy to have shared my time on earth with such a fine human being!

Stupot_ · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:30

Gay tbh

kylew · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:32

He will seem exactly like that if that's how you are yourself. However, I see him as being up himself, and no better than the religious fundamentalists he hates so much.

Metatron · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:33

Stupot_ said:
Gay tbh

Tefal · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:35

NormanPorkinson said:
What a breath of fresh air this man is in a world full of madness and irrationality!

Such a humble and polite, well spoken ambassador of reason and thought, with the intellect of a man with 3 heads. His arguments are so articulate and well delivered, he really makes me proud to be British!

What a world we would live in if everyone could reason like this man! A national treasure and I'm happy to have shared my time on earth with such a fine human being!

he's a **** tbh.

Robbo · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:37

I hope you are being (very) sarcastic.

twist3d0n3 · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:38

probably one of the most arrogant men walking this planet tbh

he's so obsessed with changing peoples' opinions on religion he makes himself look like a ****

Glaucus · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:39

He's an idiot and as just has much belifie structure as religious people.

jp_bl_68 · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:39

kylew said:
I see him as being up himself, and no better than the religious fundamentalists he hates so much.

That's the impression I get too.

manic111 · 3 Sep 2010 at 20:45

I *think* you're being sarcastic, in which case good call.

Dolph · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:05

He's as bad as every other fundamentalist...

NormanPorkinson · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:08

manic111 said:
I *think* you're being sarcastic, in which case good call.

Haha I'm not actually but this is why I like him, he gets under peoples skin and most of the time it's just bloody hilarious! I do regret his theological stuff abit but his evolutionary biology is great and is delivered so easily to a non scientist like me.

twist3d0n3 · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:09

you like big brother, don't you

Deadbeat · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:09

kylew said:
I see him as being up himself, and no better than the religious fundamentalists he hates so much.

+1

kylew · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:11

NormanPorkinson said:
his evolutionary biology is great and is delivered so easily to a non scientist like me.

Something about that screams "he sounds like he knows what he's talking about, because I know nothing, so I'll listen."

I don't think he actually intends to "get under people's skin" I think that's just his personality type.

NormanPorkinson · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:11

Dolph said:
He's as bad as every other fundamentalist...

a lot of people say that but I don't see it! If god appeared tomorrow or some other unquestionable proof, then he has said himself, he would convert to that! That's the difference!

Dolph · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:13

NormanPorkinson said:
Haha I'm not actually but this is why I like him, he gets under peoples skin and most of the time it's just bloody hilarious! I do regret his theological stuff abit but his evolutionary biology is great and is delivered so easily to a non scientist like me.

He is a fantastic evolutionary biologist, truely brilliant within his field.

The trouble is, he tries to use reputation outside of this field when he moves into philosophy, where he has proven over and over that he knows pretty much bugger all.

nydryl · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:14

He's a good writer but comes across as an extremely arrogant atheist.

kylew · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:14

NormanPorkinson said:
a lot of people say that but I don't see it! If god appeared tomorrow or some other unquestionable proof, then he has said himself, he would convert to that! That's the difference!

He says that to save face more than anything, because in his mind it's a situation that will never happen.

Spektor · 3 Sep 2010 at 21:16

Dawkins > the person reading this.