Out of the box thinking right hereIf the government stopped supplying the pill on the NHS, the need for period products would drop markedly.
Out of the box thinking right hereIf the government stopped supplying the pill on the NHS, the need for period products would drop markedly.
i pray for that day
FixedAs long as the the English continue to pay for all our free stuff
Maybe we should take the bull by the horns and start a campaign for English independence. Scotland are always moaning and I can only see the Irish situation getting worse. Wales seems OK at the moment but historically they have been a bit grumpy too. So perhaps we should surprise the other three nations and declare independence from the UnionFixed
Maybe we should take the bull by the horns and start a campaign for English independence. Scotland are always moaning and I can only see the Irish situation getting worse. Wales seems OK at the moment but historically they have been a bit grumpy too. So perhaps we should surprise the other three nations and declare independence from the Union
Don't be jelly bro, do some lifts and the ladies will want to get in your man panties tooNo one who says man panties is getting a ten, no matter how drunk she was
Ok how is this actually going to work without being abused? The act doesn't mention women (define a woman lol) so refers to "anyone who needs period products". I can see women and men just collecting as many free products as possible and selling them on ebay down to England. They aren't free, but what's now happening is that the cost is being levied on men as well as women via taxes. It will also result in a company getting the contract to supply them and hiking the price right up.
Note: I'm not saying this is a bad thing to try for. I am just pointing out that it will be abused and will end up costing a fortune.
Meanwhile my wife has a lifetime medical condition requiring three different monthly prescriptions and she isn't allowed onto the free prescription scheme.
You save money if you have to pay for more than 3 items in 3 months (3 month certificate), or 11 items in 12 months (12 month certificate).I find the Pre-Payment certificate works out about the cost of a single prescription when done yearly so if you don't already, it's well worth signing up for if your wife has multiple prescriptions
You save money if you have to pay for more than 3 items in 3 months (3 month certificate), or 11 items in 12 months (12 month certificate).
The prescription fee is £9.35 and the pre-payment certificates are:Are you sure that's right? I pay £10.81 for my wifes but the prescription charge is only £9.35 so surely you'd need ~13 items in a 12 month period?
EDIT: Unless it's like council tax and only over 10 months? I don't pay too much attention.
Thanks.I find the Pre-Payment certificate works out about the cost of a single prescription when done yearly so if you don't already, it's well worth signing up for if your wife has multiple prescriptions
Probably none. Do you honestly think people are stocking up on free individual tampons and then selling them on eBay? What a weird outlook.I wonder how many of these products end up on ebay
most people will likely get more than they need, same with free condoms from family planning I bet loads of them end up on ebay..Probably none. Do you honestly think people are stocking up on free individual tampons and then selling them on eBay? What a weird outlook.
again discrimination and sexism only seems to work one way. if he's the best candidate for the job whats the problemIt's all kicking off now:
BBC News - Group defends hiring man as period dignity officer https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-62563165
Surely enforcing this role is filled by a woman, rather than the best person for the job (according to the working group who selected the candidate), would be considered sexist... No?
It's already free round here. Every Scot gets a five-fingered discount at the local Nisa!!Surely it's only a matter of time before the Scots also receive free Irn Bru
It's a non story, he's been appointed and there's no intent to change that.It's all kicking off now:
BBC News - Group defends hiring man as period dignity officer https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-62563165
Surely enforcing this role is filled by a woman, rather than the best person for the job (according to the working group who selected the candidate), would be considered sexist... No?