During one of the recent cloudbursts we have had lately, some of the water managed to leak through the roof of my uncles house. It brought down a fair chunk of his living room ceiling.
Needless to say he contacted the house insurance company (Royal Bank of Scotland) They are refusing to pay up, claiming it is down to "wear and tear"
Sounds like typical weasel insurance excuses.
AFAIK there aren't any obvious holes in the roof so I don't know how they can expect him to see there is damage.
Any suggestions on how to handle this?
Lot of info left out of this post, however...
If they have had an expert in saying that due to a lack of maintenance the rain has been allowed to get in, then this is by definition wear and tear or a failure to maintain and in all likelihood, not covered (check you policy wording).
However if the cause of the leak was the result of damage specifically caused by the elements (previous high winds, lightning strike, drunk bird, etc., an individual incident would have to be identified) and form of damage is covered on the policy then you have an argument against their decision.
First off, request a copy of the insurance companies inspecting expert's report detailing the reasons for the deeming it wear and tear.
Secondly get your own expert's report from a qualified person, and ask them to comment on the insurance company's report. And if there are any discrepancies or grey areas (i.e. if it cannot categorically be shown to be wear and tear or failure to maintain), then open a complaint with the IC.
Complaints procedure needs to be followed to it's conclusion/final decision fo the IC, and then if you are still not happy with the decision, the financial services ombudsman is there to ensure your rights under the insurance policy are protected.
Citizen's advice bureau will also be able to assist you with this if you need help.
edited for typos