Rugby union?

Same I have huge thighs, quads and massive calfs. Its a tricky role to play and I feel like props don't get enough credit sometimes. I feel like I'll be very out of place when I play again though because I've always played prop. Sometimes its easy to be self critical and you're probably better than you think if the senior is having the same 'problems' as you against your opposition.

My first manager (2s) wanted to move me to hooker after my first few games, because I was straight talking about how I was doing. Getting myself twisted up, going backwards etc, he thought I was getting down about it. Truth is, it was anything but, I was getting into strong positions every now and then, and feeling how effective I could be, so whilst I was getting beaten, I knew I was improving. One game started out with me going back 10 yards, but by the second half they didn't get an inch out of us. Very satisfying.

Advantage with prop is you'll always be welcome, clubs always want props. We could do with some scrum halves now though, one of the other very specialist positions.
 
Bringing it back round to international rugby, having played at tighthead, and knowing the feeling of coming out of a hard scrum, just makes me so impressed with Sincklers work rate around the pitch, and soft hands.
 
Well, the world cup is basically here. How's everyone celebrating? I'm fortunate enough to work from home, so can watch tomorrows game with no worries. Will likely be playing myself on saturday (though I've got an injury that's not healing as fast as I'd like), and will be training the u8s on Sunday. Thankfully the club has been smart and moved all training a couple of hours forward so it's all done by the time the game comes on.
 
Coach asked if I was still injured, told him I'm willing to play but not 100%, looks like I'm not playing. So I'll be up the club cheering on the 2s, but that's after all the games anyway. Looks like I'll need to miss most the ABs vs SA game, since my boy has krav maga practice at 11.30am. Wondering if I fancy getting up early for Aus/Fiji.
 
Not understanding why so many people are so down on the England performance. We never looked like losing, prevented them getting a single try, and even blew some opportunities on the way. Yes the blown chances weren't great, but we need to peak 2 weeks after that game, not for it.
 
It was pointed out to me that England's tactic of smart kicking could well be with a view to minimise major impacts such as rucks and tackles.

Makes sense when dealing with a long campaign.
 
I don't know why it couldn't have just been moved a day or two. Better than just cancelling it. It is a worry that we'll not have played for two weeks.

I lived in Hong Kong for several years and typhoons are only really a problem for 12-24 hours when the worst of it passes through, the rest of it is just a bit of wind and rain.

Every day you move it later, it's a day less rest for the quarter finals.

It's also lining up to be the biggest typhoon to ever hit Japan, the last big one this summer killed 3 and caused $7bn in damages. If there's no transport, electricity or water in and around the stadium, it's not necessarily going to be fixed within 24 hours.
 
Does anyone think a day or two's less rest before the next game is a worse state of affairs than teams being kicked out of the tournament without having the opportunity to compete? Obviously if there's the infrastructure is in no fit state then don't play, but why not have some options open at least to play the game if possible. It's just daft.

I do think that the difference between a 6/7 day rest, and a 5 day rest, is very significant. Especially factoring in travel.

Thing is, all the teams signed up to the agreement that pool games would not be postponed. At the same time, if they offer something to one game, it has to be applied equally to all.

The only team genuinely able to make a difference, is Scotland, and that game hasn't been cancelled yet. Even then, I'd back Japan against them as we've seen them play so far.
 
I’m pretty new to rugby but enjoying watching any sport. Never really cared for it but the last year I’ve been to Wales V Tonga and Bristol v Bath, intending to go to more, but I still don’t understand some bits.

What’s the purpose of a scrum and why so easy to concede a penalty? This South Africa number 9 seems to be keen of kicking it. More than any other team I’ve seen so far

Scrum is a reset, the team that didn't make an error get the put in, but it's competitive, so possible for them to lose the ball. Most of rugby is around the idea that there must be competition for possession. Scrums are tough, the guys at the front have big men pushing them forwards, big men pushing them backwards, and have to stay stable, whilst potentially holding up the hooker, and moving forwards or backwards. The lower you can get, especially as a tighthead, the more likely it is that you can beat your opposite number, but if you're scrummaging low, then the rest of your front row need to as well, and your second row need to be low to ensure they're still pushing and not sliding up. Then going forwards/backwards with uneven pressures is tricky, and it collapses. Collapses can also be done deliberately to prevent yourself going backwards. This is why there are so many penalties, there's a lot of ways to gain an illegal advantage, a lot of ways to illegally stop a team with a legal advantage, and almost all of it comes with a level of danger, which means infringements are penalised rather than free kicks.

The advantage to the 9 kicking it, is that the rest of the backline can be up in line with him, with only the forwards in the ruck being offside (and only then until the winger sprints past them). If the 9 passes back to the 10, then typically that's 7-10m further back (and so the kick already has to be longer), and all your players are further back to be onside. It's rare in my mind, that you're better off passing to your 10, than simply having the 9 take the kick, except for very long territory kicks (such as Ford vs NZ), where you turn the opposition back 3, and have plenty of time to come up in a defensive line.

The boks tend to play safety first rugby, which means take the territory (much easier to defend 50m+ from your tryline than 20m+, watch the Aus game in comparison), hence the 9 kicking so much.

The funny thing is, his kicks weren't that good in the Wales game. They also don't tend to lengthen the ruck to give him protection, instead leave a forward in a blocking position, which I hope Eddie points out to the ref, and we get a cheap penalty out of (and/or SA have to adapt, and are forced into playing differently).
 
57 in a squad will include academy, which doesn't count in the cap.

Most squads are 45ish i believe. 2 players will be marquee and therefore excluded. Upto £600k extra for home grown players. Internationals can get extra cap space for international absences, upto £40k each i think. Another £400k is available for long term injury replacement.

However sarries are looking to have been over by £1m+. That's very very deliberate, and not just getting caught out by cap intricacies putt unexpected bills like wasps and quins were.

Wasps were upto the cap in seasons past, but not now. Sale are either there now or very close.
 
France weren't that good, especially considering how poor England were. I think England entered the 22 7 times in the first half, and came away with 0 points. A team not imploding would have taken 14 points from that at least, a decent team 21+. And the 2nd French try was a knock one, but more importantly, England didn't play to the whistle, which is minis rugby level.

I'm vaguely encouraged in that even without Mako and Billy, and mostly Manu, we managed to get so many 22 entries. It suggests a solid plan b, which is what we lacked against SA (who we had our big carriers for, but they weren't making yards). However I firmly believe Lawes at 6 cost us in the breakdown.

Dombrandt should be given a shot for me, but he's definitely not a Billy replacement. Very different style of player, Billy make hard yards in the tight, expected to produce fast ball in tough situations. Dombrandt is allowed to pick and choose his impacts, but does so wonderfully, with great running lines when there's quick ball already. I'd bet on Billy having better handling skills too, not many 8s are trusted to throw 20m+ passes from the lineout, whilst you pretend you're going to maul it by using your 8 at 9.
 
I started this season, was playing 1sts, but rapidly picked up a trapped nerve and worse, a groin strain that still hasn't budged 4 months later. Working on getting that in place. Trapped nerve resolved itself after a couple of months.

As for England, Lawes out of the backrow is huge. He works hard, he just works hard at being a lineout/tackling lock who can carry a bit. Whereas backrow need to be getting into the breakdown, especially against someone like Alldritt, who was a complete menace.
 
Curry still did a huge amount of his regular work, the only major noticeable difference was being at the back of the scrum rather than the side. Which defensively may even offer him better opportunities to jackal compared to the flank.

I'd definitely agree with a proper inside centre, but would look at Ford, Devoto, Joseph, with Farrell on the bench.
 
When they did string phases we turned them over. We smashed their lineout, so why wouldn't you kick, even with so many going out on the full. We left i think 12 points in missed kicks on the pitch. They knocked around 9 times, maybe more, in total conceding 20 turnovers to our 7. At no point were we behind and we led for most the match.

Yes it was close due to conditions, but if England looked unlikely to score, Scotland struggled to achieve even that.
 
Back
Top Bottom