Hi guys,
I'm planning on upgrading my bedroom gaming rig later this year and will end up buying either an AM3 motherboard, or a 1156 motherboard due to being on a tight budget and the GPUs I am likely going to buy is the either GTX 460 1gb or the HD 5850 1gb if its still available.
Ideally I'd like to buy a motherboard that will allow me to add an extra GPU later in the year or when I need the extra headroom and heres where I need advice on.
From my understanding and please correct me if I'm wrong, you can buy motherboards which offers and runs in the following dual GPU configurations (again I'm after purely a dual-GPU configuration):
1. x16/x4
2. x8/x8
3 x16/x16
Ok, here is where there seems to be a great deal of confusion as to how much of a performance hit you will get if you go from a configuration of x16/x16 to x16/x4.
The general consensus appears to be that unless you buy a motherboard which runs at either x16/x16 or x8/x8, its not worth adding a second card as the performance hit would be too much running in x16/x4.
However looking at the following articles appear to suggest otherwise.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_5870_PCI-Express_Scaling/25.html
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/08/25/gtx_480_sli_pcie_bandwidth_perf_x16x16_vs_x4x4
Does anyone have other benchmarks from reputable websites such a Tom's Hardware, Guru3D, AnandTech etc where they test each of those configurations (x16/x16 vs x8/x8 vs x16/x4)?
The reason why I ask is that there appears to be a noticable price difference between motherboards which support dual-GPUs and here are the price and configurations I have come up with:
x16/x4 Motherboads:
The cheapest AM3 motherboard I could find that starts at around £50 is the ASROCK M3A770DE 770 and for the 1156, it was the Asus P7P55 LX P55 at around £80.
x8/x8 Motherboads:
AM3 Motherboards which offer dual-GPUs at x8/x8 tend to be priced at over £100 which is a big increase in price but I did manage to find one for around £75 and that is the Asrock 870 Extreme3. For 1156 motherboards, the cheapest one I could find was the MSI P55A-G55 at around £90.
x16/x16 Motherboads:
We then move onto the higher-end motherboards that offer dual-GPU configuration at the maximum x16/x16, the cheapest AM3 one I could find, was the Asus M4A89TD PRO 890FX for around £130 and for 1156, the ASUS Maximus III Extreme at around a hefty £250.
If I decide to go the more affordable AM3 route then the cheapest dual-GPU configuration will cost me around £50 with the next up around £75 and then finally £130 for a motherboard that offers a full x16/x16.
Is it actually worth paying an extra £80 going from x16/x4 to x16/x16 for what appears to be just a 5% increase in performance?
If I choose the more expensive 1156 route, then the cheapest motherboard which runs at the lowest configuration would cost me £80 and paying just an extra £10 would fetch me a x8/x8 motherboard. However, the only socket 1156 motherboard I could find that runs in x16/x16 is the ASUS Maximus III Extreme at around a hefty £250.
I wouldn't even consider the ASUS Maximus III Extreme due to the price and how it is way too OTT for my needs but for £10 extra, the MSI P55A-G55 running at x8/x8 makes much more sense to me.
It would be great to hear everyones thoughts and experiences on running dual-GPUs at any of the above configurations and whether or not you think its worth the extra price premium going from a x16/x4 motherboard > x8/x8 > x16/x16 motherboard?
I'm planning on upgrading my bedroom gaming rig later this year and will end up buying either an AM3 motherboard, or a 1156 motherboard due to being on a tight budget and the GPUs I am likely going to buy is the either GTX 460 1gb or the HD 5850 1gb if its still available.
Ideally I'd like to buy a motherboard that will allow me to add an extra GPU later in the year or when I need the extra headroom and heres where I need advice on.
From my understanding and please correct me if I'm wrong, you can buy motherboards which offers and runs in the following dual GPU configurations (again I'm after purely a dual-GPU configuration):
1. x16/x4
2. x8/x8
3 x16/x16
Ok, here is where there seems to be a great deal of confusion as to how much of a performance hit you will get if you go from a configuration of x16/x16 to x16/x4.
The general consensus appears to be that unless you buy a motherboard which runs at either x16/x16 or x8/x8, its not worth adding a second card as the performance hit would be too much running in x16/x4.
However looking at the following articles appear to suggest otherwise.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_5870_PCI-Express_Scaling/25.html
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/08/25/gtx_480_sli_pcie_bandwidth_perf_x16x16_vs_x4x4
Does anyone have other benchmarks from reputable websites such a Tom's Hardware, Guru3D, AnandTech etc where they test each of those configurations (x16/x16 vs x8/x8 vs x16/x4)?
The reason why I ask is that there appears to be a noticable price difference between motherboards which support dual-GPUs and here are the price and configurations I have come up with:
x16/x4 Motherboads:
The cheapest AM3 motherboard I could find that starts at around £50 is the ASROCK M3A770DE 770 and for the 1156, it was the Asus P7P55 LX P55 at around £80.
x8/x8 Motherboads:
AM3 Motherboards which offer dual-GPUs at x8/x8 tend to be priced at over £100 which is a big increase in price but I did manage to find one for around £75 and that is the Asrock 870 Extreme3. For 1156 motherboards, the cheapest one I could find was the MSI P55A-G55 at around £90.
x16/x16 Motherboads:
We then move onto the higher-end motherboards that offer dual-GPU configuration at the maximum x16/x16, the cheapest AM3 one I could find, was the Asus M4A89TD PRO 890FX for around £130 and for 1156, the ASUS Maximus III Extreme at around a hefty £250.
If I decide to go the more affordable AM3 route then the cheapest dual-GPU configuration will cost me around £50 with the next up around £75 and then finally £130 for a motherboard that offers a full x16/x16.
Is it actually worth paying an extra £80 going from x16/x4 to x16/x16 for what appears to be just a 5% increase in performance?
If I choose the more expensive 1156 route, then the cheapest motherboard which runs at the lowest configuration would cost me £80 and paying just an extra £10 would fetch me a x8/x8 motherboard. However, the only socket 1156 motherboard I could find that runs in x16/x16 is the ASUS Maximus III Extreme at around a hefty £250.
I wouldn't even consider the ASUS Maximus III Extreme due to the price and how it is way too OTT for my needs but for £10 extra, the MSI P55A-G55 running at x8/x8 makes much more sense to me.
It would be great to hear everyones thoughts and experiences on running dual-GPUs at any of the above configurations and whether or not you think its worth the extra price premium going from a x16/x4 motherboard > x8/x8 > x16/x16 motherboard?