Caporegime
There isn't much information around about how much extra performance you can get with faster Ram on Ryzen 1, so to satisfy my own curiosity i spent half an hour testing, the results were surprising.
Just one game, i may or may not add more later.
Grid 2: Maximum 1080P MSAA 0, GTX 1070.
Corsair Vengeance® LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz
CMK16GX4M2B3000C15
Ryzen 1600 @ 3.9Ghz
Other relevant settings:
DRam Volts 1.41v
SoC 1.11v
PROC OPT 48 Ohms
Results: Chart made by Armageus, thank you
It seems timings make some but little difference, outright speed has about 55% scaling.
Other results from the net.
This is an excellent example with clear graphs by os4321, thank you
Just one game, i may or may not add more later.
Grid 2: Maximum 1080P MSAA 0, GTX 1070.
Corsair Vengeance® LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz
CMK16GX4M2B3000C15
Ryzen 1600 @ 3.9Ghz
Other relevant settings:
DRam Volts 1.41v
SoC 1.11v
PROC OPT 48 Ohms
Results: Chart made by Armageus, thank you
2400 16-17-17
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
--------------------
2666 16-17-17 (+11%)
Min: 117 (+6%)
Avr: 151 (+6%)
Max: 210 (+4%)
--------------------
2933 16-17-17 (+9%) Total (+23%)
Min: 122 (+4%) Total (+10%)
Avr: 159 (+5%) Total (+12%)
Max: 229 (+9%) Total (+13%)
--------------------
3066 16-17-17 (+4%) Total (+27%)
Min: 129 (+6%) Total (+16%)
Avr: 164 (+3%) Total (+16%)
Max: 240 (+5%) Total (+19%)
--------------------
Timings scaling:
2400 16-17-17
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
-------------------
2400 14-15-15
Min: 112 (+1%)
Avr: 146 (+3%)
Max: 202
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
--------------------
2666 16-17-17 (+11%)
Min: 117 (+6%)
Avr: 151 (+6%)
Max: 210 (+4%)
--------------------
2933 16-17-17 (+9%) Total (+23%)
Min: 122 (+4%) Total (+10%)
Avr: 159 (+5%) Total (+12%)
Max: 229 (+9%) Total (+13%)
--------------------
3066 16-17-17 (+4%) Total (+27%)
Min: 129 (+6%) Total (+16%)
Avr: 164 (+3%) Total (+16%)
Max: 240 (+5%) Total (+19%)
--------------------
Timings scaling:
2400 16-17-17
Min: 111
Avr: 142
Max: 202
-------------------
2400 14-15-15
Min: 112 (+1%)
Avr: 146 (+3%)
Max: 202
It seems timings make some but little difference, outright speed has about 55% scaling.
Other results from the net.
There are a couple of good videos from the guy at MindBlank Tech showing how well it scales with speed and timings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6yp7Pi39Z8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p--iuQhujqI
Pretty sure it works like this till 3200 then timings start being more important.
Shown pretty well here, gamers nexus: https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwrevie...m-overclock-windows-update-efi-updates/page-5
You got the ram to go higher? 3 weeks till I get to see where my b.die can go
This is an excellent example with clear graphs by os4321, thank you
I have an older graphics card (AMD R9 280X) and was curious what impact RAM speed would have.
My conclusions from basic Unigine Valley testing:
* In a GPU bottleneck Scenario (e.g. if GPU utilization is 99%) no noticeable FPS increase observed.
* RAM speed/timings help to address CPU bottleneck scenarios (similar to overclocking the CPU).
* About 8% FPS Avg performance increase going from bios default 2133 15-15-15-36 to 3200 14-14-14-34 in a CPU bottleneck scenario.
Quick observations (in a CPU bottleneck scenario):
* A 19% CPU overclock (3.2 to 3.8Ghz) --> 16% FPS Avg increase
* Ram overclocked to 3133 14-14-14-34 --> 7% FPS Avg increase
* CPU (3.8Ghz) + RAM (3133 14-14-14-34) --> 21% FPS Avg increase
Graphs:
https://imgur.com/a/WczXZ
Test Scenario:
Unigine Valley 1.0
GPU Bottleneck Scenario = Extreme HD (1080p)
CPU Bottleneck Scenario = Basic + DirectX11 (720p)
PC Specs:
CPU: Ryzen 7 1700 (default 3.2Ghz)
Motherboard: Asus Prime X370-Pro
RAM: Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3600C18 Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) (bios default RAM settings: 2133 15-15-15-36)
GPU: AMD R9 280X (1000Mhz core / 1500Mhz mem)
Last edited: