Ryzen Architect Jim Keller Joins Intel

[Perfect_Chaos]

I've read some **** in my time on this fourm...but this is right up there.

IMO the first Zen chips were not that great, at least in single core performance, but did well in multicore.

They did much better with Zen 2, just a shame that Zen 1 didn't start off with a lower latency to begin with.

 

[humbug]

I think you guys have your heads buried far too deep in the meaningless word of home PC's.

AMD crushes, and i mean crushes anything Intel have in every metric in the server space and that's down to their innovative design and architecture.

Intel play games best, for now.... utterly irrelevant to anything outside of this forum.

 

[koooowweeee]

I think you guys have your heads buried far too deep in the meaningless word of home PC's.

AMD crushes, and i mean crushes anything Intel have in every metric in the server space and that's down to their innovative design and architecture.

Intel play games best, for now.... utterly irrelevant to anything outside of this forum.

That's the one. Bring on the rebellion.

But can you answer above questions please pal

 

[humbug]

That's the one. Bring on the rebellion.

But can you answer above questions please pal

This: "Can @humbug confirm said claims of said guy leaving for intel"?

Me? how would would i know?

 

[koooowweeee]

This: "Can @humbug confirm said claims of said guy leaving for intel"?

Me? how would would i know?

Oh, that's not a good sign for AMD.

How much is intel paying you ? And can you keep your tats?

 

[Perfect_Chaos]

Anyone know what's going on ??

 

[koooowweeee]

Anyone know what's going on ??

Hands up! I've no idea...

 

[humbug]

Anyone know what's going on ??

No idea...

 

[jigger]

IMO the first Zen chips were not that great, at least in single core performance, but did well in multicore.

They did much better with Zen 2, just a shame that Zen 1 didn't start off with a lower latency to begin with.

I couldn't agree less.

 

[4K8KW10]

AMD crushes, and i mean crushes anything Intel have in every metric in the server space and that's down to their innovative design and architecture.

No, it's TSMC' N7 process node that crushes everything Intel 14nm.
Don't confuse the things.

As much as I e seen him troll. Nothing from AMD is impressive. Ryzen now compete with intel, yes. But as everyone says. It's old tech or refresh tech. So if you put things into perspective, there's nothing impressive in the CPU world at all.

In the x86-64 - nothing - read this thread - https://www.overclockers.co.uk/forums/threads/arm-based-computing.18895011/

 

[CuriousTomCat]

No, it's TSMC' N7 process node that crushes everything Intel 14nm.
Don't confuse the things.

If its that simple, surely Radeon's 7nm GPUs would be crushing Nvidia's 12nm?

 

[humbug]

If its that simple, surely Radeon's 7nm GPUs would be crushing Nvidia's 12nm?

It isn't, the IPC on Zen 2 is higher and Intel can't keep up with AMD's 2.5D chiplet design. None of that is anything to do with TSMC.

 

[4K8KW10]

It isn't, the IPC on Zen 2 is higher and Intel can't keep up with AMD's 2.5D chiplet design. None of that is anything to do with TSMC.

Is it possible to make the chiplets with GlobalFoundries' 12nm and if so, how large would have they been and what would have the power consumption related to PCIe 4.0 been?

 

[humbug]

Is it possible to make the chiplets with GlobalFoundries' 12nm and if so, how large would have they been and what would have the power consumption related to PCIe 4.0 been?

Parts of it are made at GlobalFoundries, but yes.