• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen clock tuner 2.0

Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
He said in the notes it will likely day either bronze or gold not silver due to the thresholds.

I'm running it now. I was bronze 5950x.
the colour scheme of the chip makes no difference really. my 3900x is silver but still able to hit 4.4GHz on two of its CCX and 4.25GHz on the other two wiht 1.25V if more voltage applied I am pretty sure it can do 4.5 4.6 on those two better CCDs
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
My 5900x came up as bronze as well, wonder if the board impacts the quality.
My recommended was pretty poor to be honest, I may as well keep is as stock as +25mhz won't make a massive difference.
However, the undervolting could be an interesting adjustment to reduce temps
ya undervolting is where tis programme come to its own.

strongly suggest using that and wait till 2.1 comes out wiht curve optimiser.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
I'm using negative Vcore offset with PBO and Curve enabled, and it still boosts normally, it also helps with my temps gives higher CB20 score.

Just ran a diagnostic but few minutes in my pc rebooted, guess something wasn't stable. It said my 5900X was a Silver sample
give it an +25mv see what happens. i noticed the voltage recommendation it gave was unstable for my 3900x in the 1.1 version so i added another increment and stress tested and all good after.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
i am gonna do a run of it over the weekend as I need my PC for work so cant be messing with it now :)

i am still on 1.1.8.0 agesa so will use the current bios for now and see if anything improves. if not I will load up 1.2.0.0 agesa and test.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
Up to you if you want to leave it at extreme or now. If you are using P1 and P2 those volts should be locked in and you can monitor those voltages in hwinfo see if you happy with the overshoot of volts.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
This new version is really conservative.

for the same voltage it has lowered my OC by 200-250MHz.

I used to run 4.35/4.375/4.25/4.25 on 1.25V. Now it says 4.1/4.2/4.0/4.05 on the same CCX and my system was completely stable on the original OC.

this is with AGESA 1.0.0.8 with 3900X.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
Just finished my tests on my 3900x

AGESA 1.0.0.8 has higher OC by 50Mhz after tuning compared with AGESA 1.2.0.0

however my manual CCX tuning yielded better result than the CTR. Took ages but got 4.3/4.3/4.25/4.25 on 1.25V where CTR was saying 4.1/4.3/4.0/3.9 on 1.25V

CB R20 with auto PBO - 7100
CB R20 with CTR tuning - 7240
CB R20 with manual CCX tuning - 7440
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
29 May 2005
Posts
4,899
I have this working just fine on my 3700x, just not sure it is worth it, with diagnose my cb20 score was over 5100, now its down 300 points ,single threaded performance is lower too, when I use hybrid mode, no wonder it s more efficient and keeps temps lower (about 4c for me) I'm also getting lower performance!
Going back to Pbo and auto ac, maybe someone can convince me otherwise or later versions improve performamce
Under PBO single core of my 3900x will boost to 4505MHz but on sustained all core loads it wouldn’t go past 4.1GHz

with the tuning I am doing way more than that on all core.
 
Back
Top Bottom