http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/eyefinity-05top.jpg
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/sam-eye-04-hands.jpg
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/sam-eye-03-hands.jpg
Looks good but i have to say the bezel is a bit thikcer than i would have imagined, especially considering it was meant to be "omgfapfapfap" thin. I can see the 6 panel version causing issues on shooters, the crosshair would most likely get lost in that setup.
3 panel version here
http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20100107/samsung-3_610x347.jpg
I really don't get why they havn't experimented with tranparant bezels, id imagine putting the screen out to the edge then puting a transparant bezel over it would answer most complaints of the bezels still being there? Or is there some unwritten law that says bezels must be opaque and the screen can't be directly underneath?
Prices appear to be $1899 for 3 and $3099 for 6.
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/sam-eye-04-hands.jpg
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/sam-eye-03-hands.jpg
Looks good but i have to say the bezel is a bit thikcer than i would have imagined, especially considering it was meant to be "omgfapfapfap" thin. I can see the 6 panel version causing issues on shooters, the crosshair would most likely get lost in that setup.
3 panel version here
http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20100107/samsung-3_610x347.jpg
I really don't get why they havn't experimented with tranparant bezels, id imagine putting the screen out to the edge then puting a transparant bezel over it would answer most complaints of the bezels still being there? Or is there some unwritten law that says bezels must be opaque and the screen can't be directly underneath?
Prices appear to be $1899 for 3 and $3099 for 6.