Satellite internet?

Man of Honour
Joined
11 Mar 2004
Posts
76,678
My parents are getting increasingly annoyed with the Internet as more and more is going online. They get a flaky 0.3mb connection, in a small village that is unlikely to ever get upgraded. Well in any sensible timeframe.

Is satelite an option? What's the costs and speeds these days? And what are reputable uk companies.

Is there any issues with them?
 
Last edited:
Havnt tested thoroughly, I think the ping times are probably the worse thing about them.

I remember we had problems with ping times being up in the hundreds, sometimes 350-600ms, can't remember what sort of speeds we had sorry.

"Latency- why is it a big deal for Satellite Internet?

It is a common perception that TCP does not work well over long-delay networks, particularly satellite. Although this is true in comparison to traditional T-1 or DSL lines, latency can be minimized to an extent where even most mission-critical applications can work perfectly over satellite.

Latency is defined as the amount of delay, measured in milliseconds, that occurs in a round-trip data transmission. Latency is unavoidable in any Internet connection and it can only be minimized using a netter managed network. Not directly related to speed, latency can be an issue with all networks including satellites.
What causes latency over satellite links?

Latency is caused by several factors including the number of times the data is handled along the transmission path (by routers or servers for example). The GEO satellites used for two-way Internet service are located approximately 23,000 miles above the equator. This means that a round-trip transmission travels 23,000 miles to the satellite, 23,000 miles from the satellite to the remote site, and then as the TCP/IP acknowledgment is returned, another 46,000 miles on the return trip for a total round trip of over 90,000 miles. Depending on your latitude, this distance to the satellite could be even greater.

Each time a data packet ‘hops’ (i.e. handled by a device along the path) several milliseconds of latency are introduced. The physics involved account for approximately 550 milliseconds of latency, a limitation shared by all satellite providers. This latency can negatively affect the performance of many business applications and software that requires real-time user input. "
 
Last edited:
While fast compared to what your parents currently achieve satellite speeds aren't exactly blistering. 5Mbps-10Mbps being roughly what you could receive.

The disadvantages are cost and pitiful bandwidth allowances with most providers restricting you to literally a few GB in usage for the month.
 
Before deciding on alternatives have you explored whether the problems can be sorted locally? What standard is the current copper wiring? Is there a phone line extension being used? What state are the filters in? Look Here for a bit more advice in regards to checking the master socket.

If you have already tried all this then apologies. The only other option would be to move closer to the exchange.
 
Yeah, the problem is the distance from the exchange and. The copper cabling which seems to be deterating.

I always get confused when converting Internet speeds.

Is that 0.25mb? Once limit is reached?
 
My parents are getting increasingly annoyed with the Internet as more and more is going online. They get a flaky 0.3mb connection, in a small village that is unlikely to ever get upgraded. Well in any sensible timeframe.

Is satelite an option? What's the costs and speeds these days? And what are reputable uk companies.

Is there any issues with them?

How about Mobile Broadband? no fixed line broadband available in my area either, but I get pretty good speeds from Three's MBB service.

I used 'Micronet' satellite broadband for around 5 years, at the time the only affordable option with them was a one way (download only) service, 2 way was very expensive. I've just checked their site and it looks as though 2 way (up to 10mbit) services are now available at more realistic costs and with reasonable monthly data allowances.

http://www.getbroadbandanywhere.co.uk/packages.php
 
Last edited:
Interested in this thread, we cant stream anything and i want to watch the f1 over the internet and we get 1megabit on a good day, that is bit, not byte
 
I'd say a 3G dongle is a much better option, providing you get a half decent signal. I used to live in a village where there was no connection to the house, and after a £130 connection fee, the speeds would have been 1-2mb at the most. So I opted for a 3 dongle, used it for about a year, no issues at all. Speeds were always 3-4mb upwards from what I remember.
 
My mom has a similar problem with her landline she lives in a small village near oxford. I don't know what the spec of the broadband is but it never goes above 15kbyte a second.

Can't you purchase 3g signal amplifiers for cheap where you put it on top of your house and you can improve the bandwidth and signal strength of a 3g connection?
 
Sat is expensive, it's crap, it's slow.

Baring in mind what the MOD and them lucky enough to have to take home with and the speeds they get (1Gbps) what offered mainstream i think dial up was better.
 
Back
Top Bottom