ScienceMark 2.0 - Lets see your scores.

I'm suprised by my score...

scimrk2dj3.jpg


On this;
AMD Athlon X2 4600+ AM2 @ 2.7GHz
Corsair XMS2 6400 4-4-4-12
Asus M2N32-SLi Deluxe
C3D ATi X1800XT



:D

InvG
 
Last edited:
I noticed another SM2 score with wildy differing (from average) results. :eek:

I wouldn't mind but it is obvious that these scores are in error. Why post them? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
kitten said:
I noticed another SM2 score with wildy differing (from average) results. :eek:

I wouldn't mind but it is obvious that these scores are in error. Why post them? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You can cancel the first two tests early, this gives megga scores and still reports as a valid test????? I presume that sometimes those tests crash themselves early sometimes hense the distorted scores. Try it - you will go off the scale lol.

Unfortunatly it make the test very difficult to prove as genuine. You could just end those two tests a sef seconds before the end and get a higher score making it very difficult to tell.

The test is therefore somewhat flawed as a benchmark.
 
SimonMaltby said:
You can cancel the first two tests early, this gives megga scores and still reports as a valid test????? I presume that sometimes those tests crash themselves early sometimes hense the distorted scores. Try it - you will go off the scale lol.

Unfortunatly it make the test very difficult to prove as genuine. You could just end those two tests a sef seconds before the end and get a higher score making it very difficult to tell.

The test is therefore somewhat flawed as a benchmark.
Click to expand...

Now why would anyone want to post known false and exaggerated benchies of thier rig? :rolleyes:

I am sure if a user got a score that was 2000 or so less than a similar powered system, they would be shocked and run the test again thinking it was in error. Yet when a score is 2000 or so above the average for similar kit the bench is accepted?

Nice clocks on air btw Simon :cool:
 
960.88

Don't think thats bad considering the rig. which is:-

2.8 Celeron D (On Water) - Running @ 3.67
2 x 512 Geil Value
Inno3D 6600GT AGP

Think it needs to be a conroe for me next though.....

Does this score seem ok for the rig? I think so.

Also, Thought I'd add a celeron to the board, as there ain't any.
 
i dont know if im doing something wrong here...

but i downloaded it, ran the exe and the prog opens...

i went to "file" "run all benchmarks" and nothing is happening???

whats the catch?
 
Probably, i need to find where I put the XL sheet with the results on since I formatted. Though the table gives people a general idea of the differences between different chips.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom