Scum
- Thread starter campbell
- Start date
- Status
and meanwhile i know someone who has issues that basically house bound them that is still struggling after months to try and have a cooker or fridge provided, the current issue is the charities delivery people rent qualified to carry them upstairs and shes got too much anxiety to ask the neighbours for help (I've offered to help too)
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2015
- Posts
- 295
- Location
- Devon
How somebody can get into an argument with this woman over chat is beyond me. Sounds like an awful judgement to make with very little if any facts.
Maybe the woman's circumstances have changed now! Who knows?
Maybe the woman's circumstances have changed now! Who knows?
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 3,114
The irony OP uses the world famous tax avoiders product to complain to someone to someone who is doing something morally questionable.
If the likes of Facebook paid their share of the taxes there would be more available for the government to target poverty etc
If the likes of Facebook paid their share of the taxes there would be more available for the government to target poverty etc
lOOKS BRAND NEW AND UNUSED TO ME????
If these items are from a welfare fund like the welfare fund the local council run in my area then they are only given out to people who actually need them, you have to show that you need them, as they are classed as everyday living essentials, only certain things, like a fridge, cooker, bed, not TVs or sofa's etc.
So to get them the council send an employee around to check what you need, therefore she either had her own and hid them to get the free one's or she didnt have them to begin with and got the free one's from the welfare fund and still decided she didnt need them and sold them. I am not sure if this is illegal etc but i am sure if the council knew they would look into it.
So to get them the council send an employee around to check what you need, therefore she either had her own and hid them to get the free one's or she didnt have them to begin with and got the free one's from the welfare fund and still decided she didnt need them and sold them. I am not sure if this is illegal etc but i am sure if the council knew they would look into it.
If you are referring to the UK story I suggest you do your sums. According to the figures released the UK gained more from tax from the bonus' of each individual than they would have gained from corporation tax.
However, this is assuming the 300+ individuals are paying tax.
Facebook paid £4,327 I Corporation Tax, that is a fact.
Irrelevant. Uk should have got the tax on their bonus and the corporation tax just like most companies in the uk.
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 7,321
- Location
- Western Seaboard
How does a company that made a loss of £28.5 million pay bonuses of £35.4 million?
Not sure what your question is?
Clearly, if your figures are correct, the company made a £6.9m profit and then choose to pay bonuses of £35.4 million and made it a loss.
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 13,418
- Location
- La France
Is he singing "Flower of Scotland" between asking passer-by for "20p for a cup o' tea"?
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 3,114
No tax on shares unless the employee decides to sell them - which may not happen for years
Someone sells their fridge and cooker for less value than my shoes, and we start to get our knickers in a twist that somehow they're "winning" or "cheating"over the system?
Imagine actually being in a situation that you'd go without a fridge and cooker in exchange for £100. They're not winning anything.
Imagine actually being in a situation that you'd go without a fridge and cooker in exchange for £100. They're not winning anything.
- Status