Segate 7200.10 500GB

JackRegan said:
I've got 2 in RAID 1 with what looks like the clear glue and they are VERY Loud, but quick.

Luck of the draw I think as I had 2 x 320Gb Seagates before and they were whisper quiet.

Jack

Loud in what way? Seeking or spinning?

Thanks,
Craig.
 
jbloggs said:
What about the Western Digital Caviar SE16 500GB 5000AAKS which is faster and quieter than the Seagate 7200.10s. :)

Oh, I wondered why everyone was 'specing' people those WD drives :)

Are there any HD Tach comparisons between the Seagate 7200.10 and the WD drives?

Which is faster out of these two?:

500 Gb Western Digital WD5000AAKS Caviar SE16
500 Gb Seagate ST3500630AS Barracuda 7200.10

A review said the following:

If you are looking for a very quiet and thermally advantaged high capacity drive then the Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD3200KS should be on your short list. The drive also offered very good game play performance and was able to make a strong showing in the general business application benchmarks.

If you are looking for a drive that offers slightly better overall performance and excels in most desktop and multimedia applications while offering competitive acoustics then the Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB drive should be at the top of your list.

Thanks,
Craig.
 
Last edited:
jbloggs said:
Have a look at Post #51 (Seagate 500GB) and Post #55 (WD 500GB).

I have 2 x WD 500 AAKSs, in HDTach they give an Average read of 71.6MB/s, also have 2 x 320GB 7200.10s, in HDTach they give an Average read of 66.3MB/s, I would also think that there would be no difference in Average read values between the 320GB and 500GB 7200.10s.

Seagate have a 5 year warranty and WD a 3 year. :)

Nice, thanks for that.

Seeing as they do have a higher read rate & a lot of people have been recommending them recently I think I might go for one :)

It's a shame the WD only has 3 years warranty instead of Seagates 5 :(

Thanks for the help everyone!
Craig.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom