lame
You've been owned and are trying to save face. Unlucky.
I've already given you another tangent to go off if you like?
Service man fights off two armed attackers
- Thread starter Arazi
- Start date
You've been owned and are trying to save face. Unlucky.
I've already given you another tangent to go off if you like?
It says you must CLEARLY DISTINGUISH who the enemy is. What do you think that means?
Do you think 'we' randomly bomb areas without any intelligence? I mean, really? The rest of the Geneva convention following world would have something to say about that .......
lol why when ppl fail to answer do all these oh no racist ..we caused wars ..isis sympathizer posts start to come up
someone makes a claim that all isis members are armed b4 bombed..i ask for proof i get 100 replies covering everything but that
Last edited:
i clearly said isis camps
where did this come from , where in my post does it suggest that..more random stuff thrown in but still no proof
Do you think 'we' randomly bomb areas without any intelligence? I mean, really? [/B ]
No you asked for evidence, were given it... Ignored it and then try make a light situation out of the fact you've had your view proven wrong.
Why make a comment defending against bombing ISIS then as a quite deliberately disgusting juxtaposition as if justifying their right to an existence.
ISIS = Combatant
You said (and I quote) "to even suggest we scope the camp out to check is stupid but pls do carry on" - Hello???
Genuine, yes.
Last edited:
nope not even close, the link provided was concerning civilians. i requested a link to show military targets cannot be unarmed as was claimed.
the military targets being isis members sat in their camps.
i know ive repeated it 4764674 times but none will be capable of understanding the above
lol cant win an argument...he must be defending isis
Again, no they did not, show us where someone said that, i have proved you wrong in the post above, your changing words or meaning from other people's posts.
Serviceman in inactive combat zone and we can logically assume unarmed = non-combatant according to evidence provided
To Amnesia:
UK serviceman abroad with family on holiday = legitimate target as "the war is everywhere"
put it back in the context it belongs in. do we scope the camps out to make sure all isis members are holding a weapon before bombing them ?
Do you happen to know any people actively serving Amnesia? Genuine question.
You are twisting what people have said by, mainly arctine.
then use his word if you feel like and go ahead and provide the evidence.
btw im not going to be sat here al day so if anyone actually wants to provide some evidence .
now is a good time
Because he lost the argument after his first post so is in the process of trying not to dig a deeper hole but in the process seems to have acquired a 360 excavator and continued on his way deeper
whats that about glass houses ?
Don't change the question now because you have been proven wrong.
Again, are you bothered if they are armed or not.