http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-37037050
Am I just behind the times or are nearly all the examples they give in that article complete rubbish.
Men are almost universally more powerful and stronger than women. To be compared to the men in such a sport is a compliment I would think.
Michael Phelps is arguably the most dominant and greatest olympian ever so again, you would think it a complement to compare a female swimmer to him.
So an athletes trainer is being credited with making her the best in her sport. Colour me surprised. Athletes change trainers all the time to try and improve and get that extra few % they need to be the best. There was no implication that the woman wasn't good, wasn't the main reason behind her success.
If you watch any amount of sport you will hear people saying "there is the trainer responsible for making him/her the athlete they are today." Murreys trainer has had that said about him a number of times over the years.
What a load of rubbish. I have heard a number of female commentators, ex sportswomen and world class athletes talk about "our girls".
Why are we so obsessed with seeing racism, sexism and discrimination where there is none. Fine, call it out when it is obvious but its just become a joke now. You can't say anything that could be negatively interpreted without that suddenly being the only intent you could have possibly had. None of the above issues are issues when it comes to mens sport.
Am I just behind the times or are nearly all the examples they give in that article complete rubbish.
When US gymnast Simone Biles gave a storming performance on the uneven bars, an NBC commentator complimented her by saying: "I think she might even go higher than the men."
Men are almost universally more powerful and stronger than women. To be compared to the men in such a sport is a compliment I would think.
Meanwhile American swimmer Katie Ledecky was praised as being the "female Michael Phelps" in the Mail Online. Both women were already world champions so why was there a need to compare them to men?
Michael Phelps is arguably the most dominant and greatest olympian ever so again, you would think it a complement to compare a female swimmer to him.
Another commentator caused outrage on social media when he implied a female athlete was reliant on her husband - after Hungarian swimmer Katinka Hosszu won gold in the 400m individual medley with a new world record, he referred to her partner, who is also her trainer, saying: "This is the man responsible."
So an athletes trainer is being credited with making her the best in her sport. Colour me surprised. Athletes change trainers all the time to try and improve and get that extra few % they need to be the best. There was no implication that the woman wasn't good, wasn't the main reason behind her success.
If you watch any amount of sport you will hear people saying "there is the trainer responsible for making him/her the athlete they are today." Murreys trainer has had that said about him a number of times over the years.
"Many commentators say 'girls' in sport even if they know they should say 'women'. This is because they think it's a trivial issue to do with political correctness and they forget in the heat of competition," says Woodward.
"But when you call a woman a girl you are actually infantilising her. A girl is a child. Women's bodies have long been infantilised in popular culture as youth is seen as attractive."
What a load of rubbish. I have heard a number of female commentators, ex sportswomen and world class athletes talk about "our girls".
Why are we so obsessed with seeing racism, sexism and discrimination where there is none. Fine, call it out when it is obvious but its just become a joke now. You can't say anything that could be negatively interpreted without that suddenly being the only intent you could have possibly had. None of the above issues are issues when it comes to mens sport.