Shooting at pre-school (Thailand)

[Greebo]

Heard on the radio this morning that a lot of the teachers fled as they assumed the gunman was just out to shoot them and never thought he would go for the kids. When he ran out of bullets he then used his knife on the kids before leaving the school to drive home to kill his wife and kid before killing himself I think they said there was only one kid who survived by hiding and a couple of the teachers who were shot who are still alive.

Mental and so sad.

 

[SixTwoSix]

When he ran out of bullets he then used his knife on the kids

Wow, that's a sobering read - it's quite a disconnect to fire a gun at someone but then using a knife, that's extremely up close and personal, I can't even comprehend that state of mind.

 

[Dis86]

Wow, that's a sobering read - it's quite a disconnect to fire a gun at someone but then using a knife, that's extremely up close and personal, I can't even comprehend that state of mind.

I don't think any sane/rational person can really get the logic of it.

 

[NVP]

So legalise carrying them around but...nothing else? I mean that makes no sense at all.

How did you get "nothing else" when I listed a whole load of areas that require reform along woth such changes.

 

[Dis86]

How did you get "nothing else" when I listed a whole load of areas that require reform along woth such changes.

So then you are saying legalise drugs. You need to make your mind up here!

 

[NVP]

So then you are saying legalise drugs. You need to make your mind up here!

Please explain.

 

[Dis86]

Please explain.

You're not being clear, contradicting yourself somewhat.

Should drug use (posession) be illegal or not?

 

[NVP]

That's a big question...

Where have I contradicted myself?

 

[Dis86]

That's a big question...

Where have I contradicted myself?

It is a big question. That's why I've asked you to clarify your woolly answers. All it would have taken was a simple yes or no.

 

[NVP]

Who's being contradictory? A complex question cannot simply be answered with a yes or no, especially for someone trying so hard to force a position on an out of context quote (which has already been clarified enough).

My position is clear for the state I hold it. I've no inclination to hash out detailed changes to laws and services, or even framework ideas on such, to someone who obviously can't let go of any bone they bite regardless of if it's been good for them.

 

[Dis86]

Who's being contradictory? A complex question cannot simply be answered with a yes or no, especially for someone trying so hard to force a position on an out of context quote (which has already been clarified enough).

My position is clear for the state I hold it. I've no inclination to hash out detailed changes to laws and services, or even framework ideas on such, to someone who obviously can't let go of any bone they bite regardless of if it's been good for them.

You. By your statement that possession should be legalised and stating that its now an incredibly complex situation which you can't possibly provide an answer to.

It's not. There are answers.

 

[NVP]

You. By your statement that possession should be legalised and stating that its now an incredibly complex situation which you can't possibly provide an answer to.

It's not. There are answers.

My statement... from another thread... about a different subject... where I never actually said possession should be legalised... Can you see why I said I have no inclination to (Dis86 translation to "can't possibly") discuss this subject further with you at this time? I'm gonna do an Angilion here and refer you to post #39.

 

[Dis86]

My statement... from another thread... about a different subject... where I never actually said possession should be legalised... Can you see why I said I have no inclination to (Dis86 translation to "can't possibly") discuss this subject further with you at this time? I'm gonna do an Angilion here and refer you to post #39.

Ironically your final post in that thread was about someone not answering a question...

 

[NVP]

Ironically your final post in that thread was about someone not answering a question...

I have answered your questions to the degree they deserve

 

[Dis86]

I have answered your questions to the degree they deserve

You've talked around the questions without providing an answer. So no, you haven't. You've done exactly what you called someone out for doing.

 

[NVP]

Then I refer you back to post 39, take your time.