Because they didn't come out at trial. Due to the 'incompetence' of the CPS, a number of innocent men have been proven to have been jailed for rapes they didn't commit.
The CPS are not impartial. They have targets to hit. What they send to court one day may not make it to court the next.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uk...rs-terrifying-incompetence-on-sex-crimes.html
literally the first result on google for 'cps incompetence'.
"There were no witnesses, no forensic evidence and his accuser also failed to pick Mr Pearson out in a police line-up."
"
The only problem was that the CCTV footage showed no assault at all. On the contrary, it showed Mark Pearson walking through the station minding his own business, his hands clearly visible at all times, the right one clutching his shoulder bag strap, his left hand – the one he is supposed to have thrust up the actress’s dress – clearly holding a newspaper."
"The CPS, in mind-boggling defiance, continues to insist there was “sufficient evidence” for this case to go to trial despite all the evidence to the contrary."
So from that woman's statement, she would ensure this man would suffer for the foreseeable future all because CPS.
Another lovely line elsewhere
"Even with incontrovertible video evidence that the “rape” against Faress was nothing but her malicious, ego-boosting fantasy, Saunders’ CPS wanted an additional scalp. This is nothing new, though: in 2014, an extra
5,000 rape prosecutions were initiated, resulting in
only another 77 convictions."
Gooooo CPS! Totally trustworthy.