Soldato
My answer to the OPs question.
No
No
Are CO2 taxes something the UK government can alter or is it governed by the EU? Problem with CO2 taxes is that they're very politically sensitive as it's linked to global warming.
And they're universally ignored by a lot of developing nations...
Prices are falling because of overproduction worldwide. There would be no support for the government changing the working and reward practices at the steel plants to make them much more cost effective, so the idea is a non starter.
Could more than 3000 people be helped if the money was spent more effectively..?
My answer to the OPs question.
No
are there any in the eu?
I can think of 3000 people straight away who would support government help.
Government help to make the industry viable would result in redundancies as plants are improved and automated, and pay cuts to make the economics work. I doubt you would support that...
The problem is making steel is not energy efficient, the amount of energy is converting iron to steel is rediculas, looking at around 3-15000cm3 per blow. Depending on carbon content.
We already harness the excess heat which is turned into steam and powers steam turbines.
We already collect the carbon monoxide that is inturn used as a fuel in turbines.
If tata actually in vested in the following we would be breaking profit targets and producing steel no else could.
* new coke ovens with by products section, the one at port Talbot was produced in the 70s . if we had that more coke oven gas would be produced and we wouldn't have to import natural gas. Also we could properly harness the following more regularly.
- tar used for road construction £2000+ per container
- ammonia used in medicinal and fertiliser £ 1000 per tanker
- benzine used in fuel £10,000 per tanker
- naptheline £7000 a tanker
With a new by products section we can produce the above amount 3-5 times a week which pays for the wages of that part of plant.
* refurbished and third vessel added to primary side of bos plant as this is the bottle kneck of the entire chain.
* new secondary steel units as they haven't been upgraded since the 80s
* new hot mill as it can only roll 1800 mm instead of the 2600 mm car manufacturers are asking for. It would cost £200mil but would make its money back in new orders and less maintence in less than 5 years.
* new power plant as most of the steam and gas produced on site is going to waste.
Like I said the main issue is chronic lack of investment
We have proven we can produce the high quality steel but have our hands tied by government regulations and forgien owners
I think the first thing the government considers if the people affected are northerners and/or labour voters.
What do you know about how steel plants work Dolph?
Investment I can get behind, but part of that investment has to also include automation, which in turn means job losses. The challenge in getting a viable proposition is that it has to work with current or lower steel prices. That means tackling costs of production, which isn't just about energy costs and green taxes, but manpower costs which are also much higher in the UK.
The same applies to the wider pool of people. Why's propping up something unsustainable on an indefinite basis better than spending money on creating new jobs/moving people to other work/etc, with the aim of creating sustainable work and useful skills which mean that subsidy can end (as opposed to dragging on indefinitely)?
I think you under estimate the damage green taxes have caused to the UK steel industry.
There were huge capital costs incurred in the industry just get ready for green taxes, never mind the subsequent levies that were imposed.
So you don't support propping them up... but you would look at propping them up through tax breaks...
I think you under estimate the damage green taxes have caused to the UK steel industry.
There were huge capital costs incurred in the industry just get ready for green taxes, never mind the subsequent levies that were imposed.
Investment I can get behind, but part of that investment has to also include automation, which in turn means job losses. The challenge in getting a viable proposition is that it has to work with current or lower steel prices. That means tackling costs of production, which isn't just about energy costs and green taxes, but manpower costs which are also much higher in the UK.