And will the mortgage company etc etc reduce their payments in a reciprocal fashion?I agree it's not ideal but possibly better than losing your job immediately? At least you'd have employment while you tried to find something better paid.
And will the mortgage company etc etc reduce their payments in a reciprocal fashion?I agree it's not ideal but possibly better than losing your job immediately? At least you'd have employment while you tried to find something better paid.
The private sector always argues that government should not interfere with the free market. Since the steel industry is part of the private sector, government should respect its wishes and allow it to die without any interference.
Quite different though.
There is no signs the steel industry will improve with just a buy out.
No. Let developing countries make steel, Britain is better off selling services.
This.
[TW]Fox;29346260 said:Which Member State said 'No' scorza?
How would this outcome have been different had we been outside the EU?
China has risked raising tensions over its role in the UK steel crisis by imposing a 46% import duty on a type of high-tech steel made by Tata in Wales.
The Chinese government said it had slapped the tariff on “grain-oriented electrical steel” imported from the European Union, South Korea and Japan. It justified the move by saying imports from abroad were causing substantial damage to its domestic steel industry.
Tata Steel, whose subsidiary Cogent Power makes the hi-tech steel targeted by the levy in Newport, south Wales, was unable to say on Friday whether any Cogent products are exported to China.
News of the tariff emerged as David Cameron confronted the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, on the sidelines of a summit dinner in Washington on Thursday night, urging him to use Beijing’s presidency of the G20 group of leading countries to tackle the problem.
All that public sector infrastructure spending on steel will surely turn things around