Should we simplify the English language?

semi-pro waster said:
A perfect example of why you need clarity and rules in language. Because an "n't" has been missed off the end of "should" the whole sentence is rendered non-sensical and that is something that might not be noticed so easily or clearly if we didn't have the defined rules that we currently do. Demonstrating a mastery of English is similar to demonstrating mastery in any other area, it shows dedication and an understanding of the art; these are attributes to be appreciated rather than pandering to the lowest common denominator. What are the odds anyone will give me for dirtydog showing up in this thread? ;)

Sorry nikebee, I actually agree with your position but the chance for an example is too good to pass up.
Click to expand...

Dammit :(
 
Justintime said:
Personally i wish english was harder, it'd stop every Tom, Dick and Harry from coming here. I've been told it is a very easy language to learn for foreigners.
Click to expand...

Really? I'd heard it was one of the easiest to learn to speak but one of the hardest to learn to spell?

Certainly not Japanese or anything, but still quite difficult.
 
No. Trying to modify an entire language like that is not only almost impossible to do consistently and thoroughly, but also unnecessary. If change needs to happen, then it will, over time.
 
Last edited:
Zefan said:
Please don't user American spelling, it makes Jesus weep.
Click to expand...

Why not? There's nothing particularly 'American' about it; it's just most people here seem to think that spelling things with zs is wrong and evil, whereas it's just that it's become less common in recent times. Both are technically correct, and in fact I think the 'z' spelling is actually more etymologically conservative.
 
Inquisitor said:
Why not? There's nothing particularly 'American' about it; it's just most people here seem to think that spelling things with zs is wrong and evil, whereas it's just that it's become less common in recent times. Both are technically correct, and in fact I think the 'z' spelling is actually more etymologically conservative.
Click to expand...

This is true in that originally the 'z' was probably used more consistently in English but then the more Gallic 's' spelling appears to have become prevalent leaving zeds to our American cousins. I suppose it depends how far back you want to take it which is the most 'correct' through history although either is still perfectly acceptable in use. I personally prefer the 's' spellings for almost everything but it is a matter of style more than a belief that the other is wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom