Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 8,876
- Location
- Hoddesdon, London, UK
LOL
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
xolotl said:What I never got with lapping was the obsession with shiny.
You want it flat, and unless you have it properly set up in a jig lapping by hand ain't going to do this.
The whole point of thermal compound is to fill in the minute imperfections in the two contact surfaces.
Flat is good, shiny is irrelevant.
xolotl said:What I never got with lapping was the obsession with shiny.
You want it flat, and unless you have it properly set up in a jig lapping by hand ain't going to do this.
The whole point of thermal compound is to fill in the minute imperfections in the two contact surfaces.
Flat is good, shiny is irrelevant.
fornowagain said:This always makes me laugh. From an Engineering point of view surface waviness is in the order of a 1000 times more important for contact than roughness.
You not going to get a HSF really flat by hand lapping
fornowagain said:This always makes me laugh. From an Engineering point of view surface waviness is in the order of a 1000 times more important for contact than roughness
Thats correct and milling is anything but flat. Annoys the hell out of me why they dont grind them in the first place, should have seen this Tuniq.Jleo said:I am glad I don't have to. I only lap to get rid of the rough surface I have to rely on the HS manufacturer to have a least made it near flat to start with
For a friction surface the Ra is the defining factor, the surface flatness is just as important if not more so. An example is a contact surface that is ground flat then knurled to create grip. Vice grips are hardly an example for a flat application and yes I've seen smooth jaws, there used for holding ground stock.Jleo said:This wouldn't be laughable if the engineering application required the to surface's to stay together from a structural pov. Its is more effective to have gripping surfaces than smooth surfaces, blimey can you imagine the London Eye/Eifel Tower constructed with flat shiney surfaces on all the ajoining beams/supports, we would never have seen it in its upright glory my apologies if I am stating the obvious
Did you ever see a new pair of vice grips with flat shiney jaws? hehehe
Jleo said:How can this be I have seen the iron/steel being smelted/produced what is done to it to determine either finish?
Justintime said:Wow now the big time experts have spoken, i must have imagined all of those C drop in those chips and sinks i've occasionaly lapped over the yrs, silly me.
I used to work with Renishaw and helped design the first gen of Nikon non contact CMM's. Does that use Ruby/Diamond probes like a Talysurf or is it non contact?mrthingyx said:I'll use my profilometer to measure their surface roughness
Yes, silly you.Justintime said:Wow now the big time experts have spoken, i must have imagined all of those C drop in those chips and sinks i've occasionaly lapped over the yrs, silly me.
fornowagain said:Normal stock is rolled, its as rough as ar**hol**. You can buy smooth, its actually described as ground stock from the stockist. Its ground on the biggest surface grinder you can imagin I've seen it at work. There are thousands of specifications for surface finish, fits and tolerances. It a large part of Engineering.
fornowagain said:I used to work with Renishaw and helped design the first gen of Nikon non contact CMM's. Does that use Ruby/Diamond probes like a Talysurf or is it non contact?
fornowagain said:I used to work with Renishaw and helped design the first gen of Nikon non contact CMM's. Does that use Ruby/Diamond probes like a Talysurf or is it non contact?
The last one I was involved with the chassis was made of an incredibly stable composite aggregate material. Used lasers and optics to get in the nano range and the lab had to be held at +-1C, breathing on a componet can change it. It was used for anything from Rolls Royce engine parts to hedge shears, I kid you not.mrthingyx said:The one we have is a diamond Talysuf thingy, although we've also got a 3D laser one (I have to have a good reason to use it... ).
fornowagain said:The last one I was involved with the chassis was made of an incredibly stable composite aggregate material. Used lasers and optics to get in the nano range and the lab had to be held at +-1C, breathing on a componet can change it. It was used for anything from Rolls Royce engine parts to hedge shears, I kid you not.
fornowagain said:Yes, silly you.
You may improve it, but it's not flat. .
mrthingyx said:Or maybe your heatsinks just needed remounting?
.
Justintime said:And thats all i was hoping to do, never said it was purely flat or that i had the machinery to do it, sometimes the sinks or IHS is totally off and a little lapping helps a lot.
Its not a belief, I've actually stuck my hand lapped heatsinks on very expensive metrology machine and been surprised just how bad my efforts have been. I've posted what I've found to be the best techniques up above. A bad hand lapping can make it worse very easily.Justintime said:Funny, it constantly gave good results after the lapping whilst no matter how many times pre-lapped it was mounted it gave the same hotter result. I'm not a big lapper but have tried it over the years and its shown results, but as always there'll be detracters to a theory and expert opinions from various people etc.. thats y'alls belief and i won't disagree with you, you got your opinion and i gots mine Moot point about IHS lapping, i usually just pop it off these days.