Soldato
Rather than 4K, I'd just rather they increased the 'HD' bandwidth.
Rather than 4K, I'd just rather they increased the 'HD' bandwidth.
It will be upscaled 1080 along with low bitrate 4k to please the masses. The retailers will love this.
I'll be keeping my 1080p OLED screen for some time.
distilled from wiki
High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) is a video compression standard, a successor to H.264/MPEG-4 AVC (Advanced Video Coding),..
...The Main 10 profile was added at the October 2012 HEVC meeting based on proposal JCTVC-K0109 which proposed that a 10-bit profile be added to HEVC for consumer applications.[86] The proposal stated that this was to allow for improved video quality and to support the Rec. 2020 color space that will be used by UHDTV.[86] A variety of companies supported the proposal which included ATEME, BBC, BSkyB, CISCO, DirecTV, Ericsson, Motorola Mobility, NGCodec, NHK, RAI, ST, SVT, Thomson Video Networks, Technicolor, and ViXS Systems...
Max bit rate for Main
and Main 10 profiles (kbit/s)
25,000 100,000 4,096×2,[email protected]
So the way I read it thats with max compression, so you'll need a min of 25Mbit/sec
And only 30fps.
Wonder how BT's IP backbone is going to handle it if everyone signs up at once.
Forgive me for quoting the Sony guy at Curry's but he said.....
Sky's 4K will not cost any more, you will have to buy a box no doubt but it will be part of your HD subscription.
Still find it a bit odd why Sky for yonks have provided 720p and not 1080p, make me think a massive overhaul of infrastructure equipment will be required to produce a 4k image to thousands of homes.
Sky prices go up and up, I'm paying over £70 now, sure I got skygo extra in that but with movies and sport and HD I really would find it hard to justify £100 a month on TV. I love my footy and she loves the films.
The upscaling on my 55" x8505 is pretty impressive, blu rays look darn good and sky looks pretty good but the Native 4k I saw via Sony's HDD's attached was amazing, have to wait and see if Sky can produce anything like that.
Providing a 1080p picture requires DOUBLE then bandwidth of 1080i and 1080p isn't (or wasn't) part of the original 'HD Ready' standard that Sky adhered to in the beginning so there are a great many TV's still in use that wouldn't accept a 1080p signal. The expense for what is a slight picture quality increase isn't worth it and I'm not sure the boxes are even capable of it which would mean 3 lots of channels (one SD, one 1080i and one 1080p) when there are, if anything, too many as it is. 4k is the next step.