But in their defence, BLM never tried to exterminate the Jews and, as of yet, have refrained from invading Poland.
It could be said that BLM are in fact invading every westernised country and not one at a time, very progressive indeed.
But in their defence, BLM never tried to exterminate the Jews and, as of yet, have refrained from invading Poland.
It could be said that BLM are in fact invading every westernised country and not one at a time, very progressive indeed.
No you couldn't because those people were actually suffering.Yes, you could also have said the same of the women's suffrage movement, or civil rights movement. You wouldn't have though, because doing so in an effort to prove a comparison with a regime like the Nazis would be absolutely ludicrous wouldn't it?
No you couldn't because those people were actually suffering.
Probably A member here
Well if they represent Marxism or Communism...
Stalin was planning a Holocaust against every Jew in the Soviet Union. It was all drawn up and planned and ready to go. Oddly Stalin died before it could start. So what ya got to say there huh?
And the communists did invade Poland, It seems messy and confusing i know but from the 3hr documentary on Stalin i seen it seems to be true.
The fact that you view one group as suffering and the other as not doesn't alter the fact that both expanded across nations. It also doesn't alter the fact that drawing comparison between BLM and Nazi Germany is utterly moronic.
Yeah - I mean the complete physical destruction of nearly all industry and many population centres, half the country being occupied by the Russians, and the other half by the rest of the great powers, nearly all Jews, homosexuals, gypsies and many other groups getting exterminated.You're right I shouldn't have compared Nazi's to BLM because the Nazi's probably did less physical damage to their own country.
You're right I shouldn't have compared Nazi's to BLM because the Nazi's probably did less physical damage to their own country.
Who is to say he didn't make bad judgements in life but is now a new man. Tattoo's are permanent but opinions change.
The thing he is saying about his dad might simply be because he is too embarrassed about his past.
Yet again he could be hardcore neo nazi but its not down to me to judge without looking at the evidence.
If he was embarrassed, maybe he could have had a cover up done at some point.
The evidence is there, he has right wing tattoos on his face by choice.
You're right I shouldn't have compared Nazi's to BLM because the Nazi's probably did less physical damage to their own country.
You're right I shouldn't have compared Nazi's to BLM because the Nazi's probably did less physical damage to their own country.
Which is 100% true but how many people have Tattoo's of ex girlfriends and wives they no longer love? Does that mean they still love them?
Happy with the tattoos are you?You're right I shouldn't have compared Nazi's to BLM because the Nazi's probably did less physical damage to their own country.