Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Hmm....
So the general gist of all these reviews posted above is that there is a difference between the i7's in gaming. I wish they would include the 5820k in to these reviews as it basically is the direct competitor in the same price range.
In intensive cpu areas in games skylake looks like it has some good performance over haswell, it's killing the 4790k in GTA5 for example.
So might not be best going with the x99 solution if looking for best performance.
In intensive cpu areas in games skylake looks like it has some good performance over haswell, it's killing the 4790k in GTA5 for example.
So might not be best going with the x99 solution if looking for best performance.
Despite what this says I see no real need to upgrade from my i5 [email protected]. I still don't see that spending £300-£400 for an extra 10% FPS, 5-6 FPS in some games, can be considered VFM! I bought this CPU in June 2011 and have upgraded from a GTX460 1GB to a GTX670 2GB and now a GTX780 6GB and seen a significant FPS increase every time. I'm not seeing any good reason to upgrade.
I don't think they are telling people with SB processors to upgrade.
Also remember they are using a heavily overclocked Titan X only at 1080p. The CPU bottleneck will reduce with less powerful graphics cards and/or as you increase the resolution and settings.
In intensive cpu areas in games skylake looks like it has some good performance over haswell, it's killing the 4790k in GTA5 for example.
So might not be best going with the x99 solution if looking for best performance.
if i have £400 to blow will I buy a CPU for 5% increase in FPS, or another 980 for 50-100%?
Let me think about that one..