You say nVidia have a documented track record with numerous threads, articles and so on? Well that's news to me. You can find plenty of articles of complaints about nVidia's driver and hardware issues, but most of the stuff you find about AMD's apparent driver issues is generally the same sort of people raging about how they'll never buy an AMD card because their drivers never work.
I was saying the difference in the level of support between the 2 companies has been well documented - you can say what you want but anyone who has been following graphic cards over the last few years will have a fair idea from reading the various articles, threads, etc. on the subject without ever having to own either card. Theres a taste of what I'm talking about here:
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=23144207&postcount=59
But its beyond the scope of a post here to really cover it in depth. Don't just focus purely on drivers or specific issues but look at the overall level of support.
No one is denying it and im the one who posted the links to that issue.
And NV was facing a lawsuit over the Vista drivers.
You see the difference is People are not defending AMD from having issues, its NV users whom are claiming that NV have less.
Its not even about who has the most issues or less issues as such its about how the consumer is affected by them.