If he sold you something which wasn't as advertised, simply put in a complaint and he will be made to pay for postage back to him. Done it loads of times
No, I am sure he simply didnt know what he was selling and that he simply saw it showing up 4 cores... Simple and easy mistake to make.
Im not going to waste my time over a couple of quid... I will be just as happy topiddle about for a bit and then bin it rather than waste time argueing over it.
I simply cannot be bothered to worry about such a trivial issue that lets be honest, is hardly going to force me to sell my house to pay for it is it?
You just watch now... I will be £8 short for my mortgage payment and because if that, I will default and the costs will escalate beyond my control and in 12 months time, I will be holding a cup out asking for 'spare change' on the street! - LOL
the i7 isnt 4x 1.6 tho. like i posted earlier, its 2.8 on one core, 2.4 on two cores, 1.73 on three or four cores.
You did say yes...
My thoughts on that, are that when I can force 2.8Ghz mode, was it also disabling the other 3 cores?
I never thought to look... I simply assumed that it was all 4 cores running at 2.8
Even so, when it does this automatically, it only does it when it is only using the one core... It will boost that up to a max of 2.8 and if it is using 2 then it goes to a max of 2.4 and 3 or 4 cores it only boosts up to 1.73, so in other words, going by that fact, then it is clear to me, that the I5 which is already at 2.6 is running the 2 cores ( plus the 2 HT ones ) and the I7, if it is running on 2 cores, can only at best hit 1.73... That means that the I5 is faster than the I7 in this case then?
Im still not entirely convinced the I7 is the better CPU, and so benching will be the best way really for me to know. Cache may also play a big role. Its absolutely shocking at just how much of a role this can play in some CPUs.