rich99million said:Apparently the 4300 doesn't do virtualisation (from what I've found on google anyway) so that'll be it I think.
I'm unsure if that means a native install would work or not![]()
Nah, VT is only needed if you want to virtualize an OS. It would run just fine natively.rich99million said:I'm unsure if that means a native install would work or not![]()
nopeStelly said:damn damn damn damn damn... can you throw that smp client for windows my way mate?
Stelly
BillytheImpaler said:Nah, VT is only needed if you want to virtualize an OS. It would run just fine natively.
You're trying to virtualize Linux on top of Windows. This doesn't work so well because you don't have VT. If you wanted to run Linux natively you could do so with no problems.Stelly said:So what is wrong then??
BillytheImpaler said:You're trying to virtualize Linux on top of Windows. This doesn't work so well because you don't have VT. If you wanted to run Linux natively you could do so with no problems.
hmm you're right - my X2 doesn't have it either according to what I've read though it does work fine with Ubuntu in VMwarelay-z-boy said:My X2 doesnt have virtualisation, iirc, that was introduced in AM2 as pacifica and it works ok for me, the only difference i found with vt on/off on my 930 was higher cpu usage in windows at idle on an os in vmware.