Associate
3DMark adds new SSD benchmark for gamers (ul.com)
3DMark added a Storage benchmark so I have submitted results of my ssd drives. The final result don't mean a whole lot apart from bigger is better. Id like to see a breakdown of the 7 individual tests in a future update making result comparisons more interesting between drives.
The overall test is long and can take 30 mins to complete them all as about 30gb of data is processed.
Test Conditions: AV Disabled, No Caching software, No Rapid Storage, Default windows NVME Driver.
Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB (X570 Gen4)
Storage Score 3320 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/3995
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 567.70 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 54 µs
---------------------------------------------------
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB (X570 Gen3)
Storage Score 2388 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/4015
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 413.33 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 76 µs
------------------------------------------------------
T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 (X470 Gen3)
Storage Score 2963 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg9373
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 519.41 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 62 µs
------------------------------------------------------
WD Black SN850 1TB (X570 Gen4) (GAMEMODE ON)
Storage Score 3886- http://www.3dmark.com/strg/10786
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 662.68 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 46 µs
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Sata SSD Drives:
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
Storage Score 1105 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/10129
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 198.08 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 170 µs
------------------------------------------------------
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
Storage Score 1262 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/4077
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 223.38 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 147 µs
3DMark added a Storage benchmark so I have submitted results of my ssd drives. The final result don't mean a whole lot apart from bigger is better. Id like to see a breakdown of the 7 individual tests in a future update making result comparisons more interesting between drives.
The overall test is long and can take 30 mins to complete them all as about 30gb of data is processed.
Test Conditions: AV Disabled, No Caching software, No Rapid Storage, Default windows NVME Driver.
Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB (X570 Gen4)
Storage Score 3320 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/3995
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 567.70 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 54 µs
---------------------------------------------------
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB (X570 Gen3)
Storage Score 2388 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/4015
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 413.33 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 76 µs
------------------------------------------------------
T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 (X470 Gen3)
Storage Score 2963 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg9373
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 519.41 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 62 µs
------------------------------------------------------
WD Black SN850 1TB (X570 Gen4) (GAMEMODE ON)
Storage Score 3886- http://www.3dmark.com/strg/10786
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 662.68 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 46 µs
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Sata SSD Drives:
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
Storage Score 1105 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/10129
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 198.08 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 170 µs
------------------------------------------------------
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
Storage Score 1262 - http://www.3dmark.com/strg/4077
Storage Bandwidth Overall - 223.38 MB/s
Storage Average Access Time Overall - 147 µs
Last edited: