So this video was made by a third year student at my uni..

Cheers. What im wondering is in terms of "production value" how it stacks up against a film that cost several k's (ie, OP) to make.
 
It was ok but it was more an amalgamation of shots than anything else and it didn't really tell a story. It could have really done with an interview to lead it through and tell me what I was watching, or at least telling a story visually (ie bike's only being ridden at the end). Still not sure what they do or what it is though (builds? repairs? is it one bloke? a shop? etc).

Also scrap the long credits. Don't know if it was a requirement of the module but it just screams arrogance and/or student.

On the topic of production value and cost, this is an interesting one that students often get tied up in, but I'm assuming you're not including wages in the £600. I run a video production company and other than travel 90% of our films have no 'cost' at all. It's simply our time and skill that's charged for.

You'll soon realise upon graduating how fluffy and unrealistic a world student film making is. Taking 5 people to make that for example; we would shoot that with one person in half a day, simply because that's all that's required and that's all there'd be budget for anyway.

Out of curiosity, what did 5 people even do that day?!

Really nicely shot though, just needs more focus on the story :).
 
The credits are a requirement, and that's not the version that was used by the company for its promotion.
I could have shot that with 2 people, i'm not disputing it.

Really im just curious how people percieve films when budgets are brought into it.
 
eyyaz...I know who you are. I'm considering whether to disclose my identity to you or just spy on you and report your every movement in log form to ocukHQ...beware...you are not safe at Rave...
 
Back
Top Bottom