Haha and the answer was . . . of course I don't, I mean why would you need a quad?
People are asking the wrong questions, no-one on these forums needs to ask "Do I need this new product xyz" almost everyone knows the answer to that question, its more a case of "I want product xyz" can anyone else help me justify the purchase lol!
Of course it will, people will be dumping their uber Conroe/Allandales very fast.
Thats the idea, the marketing people are trying to make you upgrade an already brilliant processor, they just want your money and will fill your head with guff, basically just go and do a weeks work and spend the lot on a piece of hardware that offers no 'meaningful' advantage whatsoever?
64-bit processors, um thats been useful for most of us, dual-core again offers very little, Quad-core? what rubbish, DirectX 10? nothing uses it yet and even when it does what exactly will directx 10 look like over well coded DirectX 9?. NCQ on hard-drives, SLI, Crossfire, PCI-express, the list goes on and on and on.
Are people really so gullible? I don't think so, I know how I see things and I'm guessing a lot of other consumers do to, the Quad-Core is a huge flop, INTEL have had to almost cut the price in half to tempt people to buy them, if they were selling well then they wouldn't have reduced the prices so much would they?
£75 quid is a very sweet price for a processor, £150 is pretty much top end but if you hit me with every last bit of hype and show me lots of pretty charts showing benchmarks with the new product whooping everything else then I may, just may rise to a top spend of £200 but I'm not gonna spend one penny more. More than likely I'm gonna buy the £75 quid product and tweak/overclock it to get more *Bang for Buck*