Social media bosses could be liable for harmful content

It’d be healthier and better for all involved if they were simply banned outright.
I know it's despotic but I agree.

Every village has an idiot. But they're isolated. You bring about the internet and social media, all those village idiots can come together (without coming together physically) it emboldens their views and gives them power and more scope to convince more morons into it. See: flat-earthers, communists, neo-nazis, <insert fringe view here>.
 
pubs/clubs have 'door-men', so a voluntary code though to protect their customers, themselves, which, would soon be in other institutions if needed,
so I don't see the physical space analogy as off-beam.

There's been no NZ backlash from youtube advertisers afaik, like, somewhat, for the comments on childrens videos,

....Everybody thought Anybody could do it but Nobody realized that Everybody
wouldn't do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when
Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
 
pubs/clubs have 'door-men', so a voluntary code though to protect their customers, themselves, which, would soon be in other institutions if needed,
so I don't see the physical space analogy as off-beam.

There's been no NZ backlash from youtube advertisers afaik, like, somewhat, for the comments on childrens videos,

....Everybody thought Anybody could do it but Nobody realized that Everybody
wouldn't do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when
Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
They're private establishments.

The internet is legally public:
For all allegations concerning a public electronic communications network (a service provided for and funded by the public, for the benefit of the public, and thus catching the internet and mobile phone networks widely available to the public: Chambers v DPP [2012] EWHC 2157)
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidan...es-involving-communications-sent-social-media
 
This will be the end of social media, unless your a bland person.

The biggest problem for social media sites is the people who sign up to social media sites.

This is all about dumbing down debate. Though I can see why some people dont have any problem with that :D
 
This will be the end of social media, unless your a bland person.

The biggest problem for social media sites is the people who sign up to social media sites.

This is all about dumbing down debate. Though I can see why some people dont have any problem with that :D

No such thing as ‘debate’ on social media. Literally no loss to anyone if they disappear.
 
I can't see what role fb/google played in the identification of them, but, New Zealand are prosecuting video distributors .. would the UK similarly prosecute folks ?

Indeed, facebook was again, up in front of digital content commitee this week, however, I did not see any discussion on uploader identification/prosecution.
https://pressgazette.co.uk/mp-tells...e-not-doing-your-jobs-over-extremist-content/

The teen is one of 10 people police have taken action against for objectionable publication offences relating to the video of the Christchurch terror attack.

... as "objectionable" on March 18, because of its depiction and promotion of "extreme violence and terrorism".
The classification made it illegal for anyone in New Zealand to view, possess or distribute the video in any form, including through social media.
 
How much more careful would people be about what they post online, if they couldn't hide behind online aliases?
 
The platforms need this type of content to survive, imagine Twitter without all the stuff people deem harmful, it would be dead.

To make it work there would need to be a very narrow scope on genuinely harmful content vs stuff that may offend.
 
How much more careful would people be about what they post online, if they couldn't hide behind online aliases?

We'd basically end up as a country like China and North Korea where everyone openly loves the government and parrots whatever messaging has been approved by those with power over society for fear of repercussions. I mean we've already seen something similar with COVID where things were dismissed as conspiracy theory and people cancelled for voicing them, even though they were later proven to be correct. Who wants to live in a society where being in the consensus is more important than being right?
 
Back
Top Bottom