It’d be healthier and better for all involved if they were simply banned outright.
Alright Hitler, calm down.
It’d be healthier and better for all involved if they were simply banned outright.
I know it's despotic but I agree.It’d be healthier and better for all involved if they were simply banned outright.
They're private establishments.pubs/clubs have 'door-men', so a voluntary code though to protect their customers, themselves, which, would soon be in other institutions if needed,
so I don't see the physical space analogy as off-beam.
There's been no NZ backlash from youtube advertisers afaik, like, somewhat, for the comments on childrens videos,
....Everybody thought Anybody could do it but Nobody realized that Everybody
wouldn't do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when
Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidan...es-involving-communications-sent-social-mediaFor all allegations concerning a public electronic communications network (a service provided for and funded by the public, for the benefit of the public, and thus catching the internet and mobile phone networks widely available to the public: Chambers v DPP [2012] EWHC 2157)
you're right ... but, once you've negotiated your https encryption with fb, say, is that still true, - you have accepted an invitation to their private space. ?They're private establishments.
This will be the end of social media, unless your a bland person.
The biggest problem for social media sites is the people who sign up to social media sites.
This is all about dumbing down debate. Though I can see why some people dont have any problem with that![]()
The teen is one of 10 people police have taken action against for objectionable publication offences relating to the video of the Christchurch terror attack.
... as "objectionable" on March 18, because of its depiction and promotion of "extreme violence and terrorism".
The classification made it illegal for anyone in New Zealand to view, possess or distribute the video in any form, including through social media.
With a huge online following behind him, the Great Londini is taking on the trolls - but isn't that TikTok's job?
Aahh Vigilante justice.Who is TikTok’s masked vigilante?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-58195065
First i've heard of him?
Wouldn't work. Go look at the nonsense known as cancel culture.How much more careful would people be about what they post online, if they couldn't hide behind online aliases?
How much more careful would people be about what they post online, if they couldn't hide behind online aliases?