Nobody pays list price for a Mini unless they are daft.
I think you missed the point. The Absolute is irrelevant to the depreciation. the % mini is applying is what's relevant. If everyone gets a discount on the purchase price, that will simply be reflected in the residuals but the % depreciation is the same.
The purchase price is irrelevant - what matters is purchase price less residual value. A £30k car thats worth £20k in 3 years time is cheaper than a £20k car thats worth £5k in 3 years time, for example, despite being more expensive in terms of purchase price.
You're comparing apples to pears. I stated that it can be assumed most cars will depreciate by 50% in 3 years as evidenced by the PCP residuals and pretty much every used car i've ever searched for. Your example is using a different depreciation scale for cars A and B which is totally off point.
I have never looked into the purchase of a Countryman but you don't need a minimum of £25k for a Mini hatch. The Cooper starts at £15k new, a high specification example is £18-19k after negotiations, for a brand new car. Used you can expect to pay £15-16k for a decent enough year old car. There are many overpriced used ones - so don't buy them.
I think you're out of touch mate - go spec up a mid range hatch or countryman and see what the quote is. Standard + Pepper Pack + Auto + Cooper = 23k. Chilli = 25.5k, Cooper S = 28k
Countryman Cooper S + chilli + auto = 31k. Mini hiked up the prices to insane levels.
This hasn't been my experience but frankly even if it was, Mini pick up the tab.
Build quality inside is a bit suspect, I agree with that. It's one area where the new model is a major improvement.
Like I said, we've run it from 1 year to 5 years old and in that time have lost about £6000 in depreciation, spend £800 on two years warranty and paid 60 quid for a brake fluid change. It's cost £120 a year to tax, has averaged 45mpg and only needed one new set of tyres.
For what was a year old 'hipster' car IMHO that's incredibly reasonable motoring costs. I can't think of many cheaper ways of covering 45k miles in a nearly new car. Certainly I doubt a Fiesta or a Corsa would have been cheaper - likely more expensive by virtue of the higher depreciation.
You either got it extremely cheap relative to market or your value estimation is way off. You can't be the only mini owner to defy market depreciation.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Cactus - it's a decent car. However it's not as good as the Mini and neither should it be, it's in a different market segment and costs much less to buy.
The cactus' interior is absolutely terrible - it's like a Van or something. But, having driven the new EAT6 with the turbo petrol I can honestly say that I couldn't fault it other than for its interior and even more so when I look at the new price which can be had for circa 16k OTR top spec. That's pretty remarkable for a car with all the bells and whistles one needs, great looks, amazing MPG, a full auto torque converter, media pack and reversing cam included as standard (mini, hello?) and tons more space inside and in the boot. It's on par with the Cooper for power despite being 1.5/1.6 and costs about 60% more spec'd up and seems to have a reliability issue.
So i would actually argue it's better than the Mini and its only a fraction larger (4.1m vs 3.95m)