• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Some benchmarks going from Gigabyte Vision RTX 3080 to Asrock RX9070XT Steel Legend

Caporegime
Joined
17 Jul 2010
Posts
26,664
For fairness I also updated to the latest Nvidia driver available as of Friday 14/03/25.

First up we have Fire Strike, 3080 first. I know it's an older benchmark but it was already installed on my PC:
FDlx2z6.jpeg


Now the 9070XT:
IrXHHYD.jpeg


Time Spy next, again 3080 first:
axHw0a1.jpeg


And then the 9070XT:
Zh9gfFQ.jpeg


Steel Nomad next, 3080 again
kGo2Z9v.jpeg


And 9070XT:
5vNVjgg.jpeg


Next I already had the Monster Hunter Wilds benchmark installed. Compiling Shaders on this bench takes 10 minutes. A ridiculous wait. 3080 first:

tNVzxy2.jpeg


And the 9070XT:
vIPQvLJ.jpg


I re-ran the benchmark at high settings, as the game picked for my 3080 run to provide a more valid comparison.

Just thought this might help anyone else on the fence about upgrading. There seems to be roughly a 50% uplift in performance without drilling down into the numbers too deeply. For a £300 price, once I sell my 3080 (it should be on the MM in a day or two), I'm happy to accept that.
 
Last edited:
Decent for £300 but having looked at gaming at 1440p myself with 3080 I want a bigger jump , I wonder how much the 5950x is holding it back

 
Your results vs the 3080

Graphics Fire Strike: +40%
Graphics Time Spy: +61%
Steel Nomad FPS: +56%
Monster Hunter FPS: +17%

My RX 7800 XT vs your 3080.

Graphics Time Spy: 20,870 +17%
Steel Nomad FPS: 46.1 +4%

I don't have a Monster Hunter result on high but could do one if you like?


 
Last edited:
I've re-run the MHW bench on high settings to provide a more even comparison. It's included above. You'll need to re-do your sums for that bench @humbug .
 
Last edited:
I've re-run the MHW bench on high settings to provide a more even comparison. It's included above. You'll need to re-do your sums for that bench @humbug .

Graphics Fire Strike: 56,380 / 40,318 = 1.398 (+40%)
Graphics Time Spy: 28,614 / 17,738 = 1.613 (+61%)
Steel Nomad FPS: 68.75 / 44.19 = 1.5556 (+56%)
Monster Hunter FPS: 90.45 / 70.07 = 1.290 (+29%)

You're right, i got Monster Hunter wrong :)
 
Graphics Fire Strike: 56,380 / 40,318 = 1.398 (+40%)
Graphics Time Spy: 28,614 / 17,738 = 1.613 (+61%)
Steel Nomad FPS: 68.75 / 44.19 = 1.5556 (+56%)
Monster Hunter FPS: 90.45 / 70.07 = 1.290 (+29%)

You're right, i got Monster Hunter wrong :)
I did, not you. I didn't run the same graphics presets on both runs.
 
Historically I'd think of this as a mediocre upgrade but in the context of the last few years, I think you did real good.

We all have to spend big dollars on essentially no gains because one generation is an overclock and not only are we being charged for it, it's the most expensive one on record, and the other company didn't even try in the high end.
 
Historically I'd think of this as a mediocre upgrade but in the context of the last few years, I think you did real good.

We all have to spend big dollars on essentially no gains because one generation is an overclock and not only are we being charged for it, it's the most expensive one on record, and the other company didn't even try in the high end.
It was a performance and VRAM upgrade really, for the 16GB compared to the 10GB.
 
You will have paid about the same for the 3080?

The 3080 was always a good card, only about 10 to 15% short of the 3090.

Monster Hunter is not a great result for AMD, its UE5, i'm sure if i benchmark the same settings i would end up behind the 3080 and yet overall the 7800 XT and 3080 are very equal, things haven't moved a lot since the 3080, despite 2 generations now since then, but at least the 9070 XT does offer decently more performance for that 3080 money, even in RT its about 30% faster in Cyberpunk vs the 3080, unlike the 5070 which is the same price in reality and barely moves the needle from the 3080 in raster or RT.

This aside from the 16GB, which these days is increasingly needed, even 12GB doesn't really cut it, looking at you again 5070.
 
Last edited:
You will have paid about the same for the 3080?

The 3080 was always a good card, only about 10 to 15% short of the 3090.

Monster Hunter is not a great result for AMD, its UE5, i'm sure if i benchmark the same settings i would end up behind the 3080 and yet overall the 7800 XT and 3080 are very equal, things haven't moved a lot since the 3080, despite 2 generations now since then, but at least the 9070 XT does offer decently more performance for that 3080 money, even in RT its about 30% faster in Cyberpunk vs the 3080, unlike the 5070 which is the same price in reality which barely moves the needle from the 3080 inn raster or RT.

This aside from the 16GB, which these days is increasingly needed, even 12GB doesn't really cut it, looking at you again 5070.
I think I paid about £800 for the 3080. RRP at the time.

If the 3080 had 16GB of VRAM I'd likely have kept it for another generation yet. I had no performance complaints about it at all.
 
Last edited:
I think I paid about £800 for the 3080. RRP at the time.

If the 3080 had 16GB of VRAM I'd likely have kept it for another generation yet. I had no performance complaints about it at all.

Oh.... Crypto boom? And now you needed a new GPU during the AI boom, that sucks.... :(

Edit: RRP? was it an Asus taxed one? MSRP for those was $700, if not an Asus one...
Eedit 2: ok...
 
Last edited:
Its actually about 10% faster than the 3080, i'm a little surprised by that, CPU bottleneck on the 9070 XT?

Also sorry for the blownout image, HDR....

kT4s5om.jpeg
 
My brother managed to snag a 9070 XT Nitro+ to upgrade his 7800XT TUF. Across 6 benchmarks he saw a 37% uplift, although taking out Heaven (which saw a meagre 13% boost) the average climbs to 42%.

He's very pleased with the switch though it did cost him £400 (£700 for the Nitro+ minis the £300 he got from a mutual friend for the 7800 XT).
 
for anyone talking about jumping from 7800xt to 9070xt, heres timespy scores from my end if it helps:

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/54102089 - 9070xt/9800x3d

Total Score 26 382 Graphics Score 29 879 CPU Score 15 863​


https://www.3dmark.com/spy/51347260 - 7800xt/9800x3d

Total Score 19 694 Graphics Score 20 796 CPU Score 15 146​


both at stock and with a 9800x3d -20 curve.

here a 7800xt with a 5900x score for anyone considering jumping from am4 to am5

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/42833358 - 7800xt/5900x

Total Score 17 638 Graphics Score 19 548 CPU Score 11 355​

can get some decent jumps with overclocking both cards but thought itd be easier for people looking at stock scores.
 
Last edited:
for anyone talking about jumping form 7800xt to 9070xt, heres timespy scores from my end if it helps:

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/54102089 - 9070xt/9800x3d

Total Score 26 382 Graphics Score 29 879 CPU Score 15 863​


https://www.3dmark.com/spy/51347260 - 7800xt9800x3d

Total Score 19 694 Graphics Score 20 796 CPU Score 15 146​


both at stock and with a 9800x3d -20 curve.

here a 7800xt with a 5900x score for anyone considering jumping from am4 to am5

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/42833358 - 7800xt/5900x

Total Score 17 638 Graphics Score 19 548 CPU Score 11 355​

can get some decent jumps with overclocking both cards but thought itd be easier for people looking at stock scores.
You can basically get a 60-70% improvement over the 7800XT if you overclock a 9070XT- Timespy scores (graphics) 33000 are achievable.
 
Last edited:
You can basically get a 60-70% improvement over the 7800XT if you overclock a 9070XT- Timespy scores (graphics) 33000 are achievable.

I never really took much interest in Synthetic Benchmarks over actual gaming benchmarks

In stock form in timespy the 9070xt is ahead of 7900xtx , 4080 super , 4080 and close to 5080 but that doesn't translate over in actual games

5i8gInY.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom