First of all, hope you all had a good new year.
I've had 4GB since I got a new mobo+cpu+memory combo because I was on a slight budget but now I'm feeling the sting of 4GB when it comes to certain tasks (mainly Cities: Skylines and rendering high res buddhabrots, both causing loads of memory changes and using huge capacity).
I'm using an FX 6350 (AMX hex core) and M5A97 LE R2 motherboard (DDR3). So of course my memory performance is always going to be lower than an Intel setup and that's what is making me wonder if going for fast memory or low latencies is even worth it (is it "bottlenecked" by the memory controller or does that just reduce the scaling of performance from better RAM?).
I could just order a set and no doubt be happy, because capacity is by far my limiting factor right now, but I thought I'd get some opinions on what matters because I've not been focusing on (non-embedded) hardware so much in the past couple of years and could end up loosing out on something way better for pretty much the same cost.
Would it be worth me spending much more than around £40 for faster memory or marginally lower latencies? Or should I pick a reliable and trusted pair that isn't really all that much better on paper? (so it's the actual fab and chip tech that is clean rather than nice specs on paper), and in that regard which brands are more trusted these days?
I've had a look around for testing people may have done but it's always at the very high end so may not be relevant.
Some thoughts:
So, I would probably be happy with this:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...dual-channel-kit-hx318c9srk2-8-my-208-ks.html
But then why is this pair slightly more expensive even with worse specs on paper? (very slightly worse timings):
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...ual-channel-kit-hx318c10fwk2-8-my-172-ks.html
And then there are pairs that are almost double the price but still worse on paper:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...al-channel-kit-hx318c10frk2-16-my-169-ks.html
And ones that same higher price but with lower timings again:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...ual-channel-kit-hx318c9srk2-16-my-207-ks.html
But then maybe I should avoid Kingston altogether for some reason I am not aware of? I avoided crucial in the past because of their cheesy TV adverts for non-techies but is there anything wrong with them? Cheesy name brands make me weary of marketing junk getting in the way of actual performance (such as "Team Group" sounding silly, to me, but maybe they are the best to go for?), etc. etc.
See my dillema, is there some "problem" with the cheaper modules, would that only hit me if I was pushing them to the limit on an Intel system, are they just older fab?
I've had 4GB since I got a new mobo+cpu+memory combo because I was on a slight budget but now I'm feeling the sting of 4GB when it comes to certain tasks (mainly Cities: Skylines and rendering high res buddhabrots, both causing loads of memory changes and using huge capacity).
I'm using an FX 6350 (AMX hex core) and M5A97 LE R2 motherboard (DDR3). So of course my memory performance is always going to be lower than an Intel setup and that's what is making me wonder if going for fast memory or low latencies is even worth it (is it "bottlenecked" by the memory controller or does that just reduce the scaling of performance from better RAM?).
I could just order a set and no doubt be happy, because capacity is by far my limiting factor right now, but I thought I'd get some opinions on what matters because I've not been focusing on (non-embedded) hardware so much in the past couple of years and could end up loosing out on something way better for pretty much the same cost.
Would it be worth me spending much more than around £40 for faster memory or marginally lower latencies? Or should I pick a reliable and trusted pair that isn't really all that much better on paper? (so it's the actual fab and chip tech that is clean rather than nice specs on paper), and in that regard which brands are more trusted these days?
I've had a look around for testing people may have done but it's always at the very high end so may not be relevant.
Some thoughts:
So, I would probably be happy with this:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...dual-channel-kit-hx318c9srk2-8-my-208-ks.html
But then why is this pair slightly more expensive even with worse specs on paper? (very slightly worse timings):
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...ual-channel-kit-hx318c10fwk2-8-my-172-ks.html
And then there are pairs that are almost double the price but still worse on paper:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...al-channel-kit-hx318c10frk2-16-my-169-ks.html
And ones that same higher price but with lower timings again:
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/king...ual-channel-kit-hx318c9srk2-16-my-207-ks.html
But then maybe I should avoid Kingston altogether for some reason I am not aware of? I avoided crucial in the past because of their cheesy TV adverts for non-techies but is there anything wrong with them? Cheesy name brands make me weary of marketing junk getting in the way of actual performance (such as "Team Group" sounding silly, to me, but maybe they are the best to go for?), etc. etc.
See my dillema, is there some "problem" with the cheaper modules, would that only hit me if I was pushing them to the limit on an Intel system, are they just older fab?
Last edited:
