Full Write Up:
Sony 42" V3000 vs. Panasonic 42"PX80
Well,
First thing is first - Massive respect to John Lewis who took the Tv back no problems. In fact, I almost thought they were too relaxed about the whole thing! When I came to drop the Sony off I went into the CCP (Customer Collection Point) and handed the bloke my papers. He and his helper wheeled the new PX80 to the car and helped me unload the V3000, then reload the PX80.
It is worth noting that the PX80 box is lighter, 'fatter' and shorter than the V3000 and fitted confotably in the back of a 207 with the seats down.
So, back to the whole 'too relaxed thing'. We handed over the v3000 and the bloke didn't even check to make sure there was even a Tv inside it! It could well have been a few bricks. Anyway, they did have my address and postcode I suppose, but If I were them, I would have checked it!
Anyway, we got home and started the unboxing. This seemed much easier than the v3000 and set up was a doddle. The set also seemed lighter, although this may well be because of the heavy Sony stand.
Once I plugged in the Tv box (scart), Media Pc (HDMI) and Xbox 360 (HDMI) I moved back to work out the correct angle and viewing distance. We se it to approx 6 feet from the sofa and then began the set up.
I skipped the digital scan for channels as this was not needed and selected the scart output. Straight away I noticed the Tv was BRIGHT - and I mean stupidly bright. I changed to cinema mode and instantly felt much better about it all.
It is set to 'Vivid' by default and this looks flipping awful. Colours didn't seem accurate and it would blind you in a dark room I recon.
Once set to 'cinema' and brightness / contrast / etc etc changed to the setting recommended on the
www.hdtvtest.co.uk website.
Against all advice I put the cricket on!!! This is only worth mentioning because some bloke on AV Forums got, what he thought at the time, was the dreaded permanent screen burn (It actually turned out it was just very bad retention and went after a few days). Signal was through Scart on Sky Sports 1. The colours looked life like, vibrant and in my opinion, not as over-powering as the Sony. Motion handling was smoother and even when the camera had to pan very fast for a 6 played to the leg side, the set did not display any issues I could see at my viewing distance. This may or may not be due to the introduction of 100Htz tech in this set which I had not seen before. The V3000 does not have this.
I then tested it with my media Pc. Using a 720p x264 version of Blade Runner the set showed how it was head & shoulders above the V3000 in black levels. It is fair to say the V3000 was destroyed in this aspect. Before the Sony would have serious issues trying to display dark scenes and you would really struggle to see any detail at all. With the PX80 dark, smoky scenes are shown in all their glory. This is not to say that the PX80 could not deal with bright scenes as well, in fact, against a dark background the panel was very impressive.
For watching SD the PX 80 is crisp, clean and shows clear definition. It is noticeably better than the V3000 in this respect. In HD the PX80 destroys the V3000 in black level, and I feel this is a very important part of watching movies.
Is there anything that I am not happy with in regards to the PX80? Well, not really to be honest. I prefer the look and design of the V3000 and its remote, but that is personal preference. The picture (SD & HD) and Sound are far superior, to the point that it is noticeable. I originally didn't think there would be that much difference between two sets of fairly equal value - how wrong I was!
I hope this fairly brief write up was useful to some who are considering which set to go for. It took me a long time to decide, and I made the wrong choice in the V3000, but now that I have the PX80 I am over the moon! Please note that I am not a professional reviewer, and may not be able to answer all of your in-depth questions.
For a professional review & settings go to
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/Panasonic-TH42PX80/