rome87 said:
stickroad there must be a sizeable differnce in performance between the q6600 and the qx8500 surely ?
"oh the possibiltys so much too chose from
Of course their is. But you can clock the Q6600 to the QX6850 speeds. The point im trying to make though is whats the point in getting a 600 odd pound chip that you wouldn't take full advantage of?
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 64-Bit Edition DVD
Intel Core 2 Quad Pro Q6600 "LGA775 Kentsfield" 2.40GHz (1066FSB)
Thermalright Ultra-120 (Socket 754/939/940/LGA775) Heatsink
Gigabyte GA_P35_DS4 (Socket 775) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard
G.Skill 4GB DDR2 PQ PC2-6400C5 (2x2GB) CAS5 Dual Channel Kit
BFG GeForce 8800 GTX OC 768MB GDDR3 HDTV/Dual DVI
Western Digital Caviar SE16 500GB 5000AAKS SATA-II 16MB Cache - OEM X2
Samsung SH-183LBEBN 18x18 DVD±RW Dual Layer Serial ATA Lightscribe
Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Fatal1ty Professional 7.1 Soundcard - Retail
Corsair HX 620W ATX2.2 Modular SLI Compliant PSU
Akasa Eclipse 62 Aluminium Case - No PSU
Total : £1,448.58
If you Romeo bought a system that took all of your budget up. I bought the system above for a grand less. When the next Gen GPUs come out i would upgrade and i would be able to play the latest games out much better than your system that costed a grand more.