RAID makes your data less safe, and with there being two drives there's a higher chance of one failing.
Thats the exact opposite of what RAID does. Thats the exact opposite of what RAID does.
RAID0 is the only method that's less safe, and that isn't technically RAID.
In my opinion RAID1 is not beneficial in a domestic environment, all it provides is the ability to continue operating in the event of a disk failure - it's NOT a substitute for a backup.is raid1 worth it? or do you think i'll be alright with a single 400-500gb drive?
you normally get some warming that a drive fails right?