Spec me - Starter DSLR

Permabanned
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Posts
2,243
Location
France
Hi :)

Budget 300-400 euros. 400 is the absolute max. Prefer to keep it around the 300 mark.

Not adverse to buying 2nd hand (no private sells. Reputable refurbish companies only)

I want to keep the initial outlay quite low until I can decide if it's worth sticking some serious cash into.

My only exp with a camera is my 50quid point n shoot Sony...

Amazon has this on offer http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/...&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=358550147&pf_rd_i=468294

Any good?

I don't want anything too complicated. If I feel I can achieve something with a camera then I'll start looking into higher end consumer models once I got to grips with the basics.

What am I going to photograph...who knows :D I live in a nice part of the world so it could be mountains, wildlife, people...anything really.

Talk to me about macro lenses...I've been on the odd photo forum and the close up of bugs are quite amazing. Are these pricey? are 2nd hand lenses worth the gamble?

At some point I might buy a reasonable telescope (I live in the sticks so no light pollution...). Something that would be good at taking picture via a telescope would be good.

Ta!
 
47 views and no replies....that speaks volumes for this sub forum. Bet if I increased my budget to 4k people would be all over this like a rash.
 
Last edited:
As a starter camera (if you're sure that you want a DSLR), the 1100d would do you very well indeed. It would also leave you the budget to get yourself a telephoto lens as well if you think you'll need it.

I bought my first camera (450D), from mpbphotographic, who are a reputable reseller. You could get a barely used body for £180, and then spend 200 on a lens.

What kind of photography do you think you'll be taking? (e: just read a bit of your post)

For macro, you could get a, extension tube, which allows you to do this on the cheap (relatively).

Used lenses can be fine, especially if an enthusiast owned it. TP would be a good forum to buy off for this sort of thing.

I'm not hugely clued up on macro lenses, but for a telephoto, you could get a 70-300 for about £200.
 
Last edited:
You could get a used Canon 600D within budget with kit lens. This would be a good starting point.

Another option would be a second hand Canon 50D, or an older 40D but these would be used and maybe over budget.

I am not too familiar with Nikon's at the price range, or any other brand I'm afraid.

Best bet is to go into Jessops and handle the Camera's, cycle through settings for aperture, shutter speed, ISO, through the menu's etc etc. Buying something that is comfortable to use is pretty important IMO. What I will say about the 1100D (and older 1000D) is that they are very small, so depending on the size of your hands, you may find that annoying and it is something that would become increasingly tiring as time goes on.
 
Last edited:
Nikon D5100 is an absolute steal ATM.

I have one, very good beginner/intermediate dslr. Great Image quality. Convenient swivel screen. Slight delving into menus for certain stuff.. but that aside, very very good especially at the current prices.

@D.P. I swear I'm not stalking you mate ;)
 
I'm hoping to pick my first SLR up next month, currently not sure between the Nikon D5100 or the Canon 600D/650D

Nikon
-Cheapest!
-No OEM Battery Grips

Canon 600D
-Not really any cheaper than the 650D (2nd hand)
-OEM Battery Grip

Canon 650D
-Touch screen
-OEM Battery Grip
-Most expensive!

Performance wise they all seem to be pretty closely matched, with the Nikon edging it image quality wise. I do however plan to use mine a lot one camping, so the convenience of having 2 batteries in the grip really appeals! Also, whilst some will denounce the touch screen as a gimmick, a lot of the reviews seem to think it's genuinely quite a useful touch.
 
Hi :)

Budget 300-400 euros. 400 is the absolute max. Prefer to keep it around the 300 mark.

Not adverse to buying 2nd hand (no private sells. Reputable refurbish companies only)

I want to keep the initial outlay quite low until I can decide if it's worth sticking some serious cash into.

My only exp with a camera is my 50quid point n shoot Sony...

Amazon has this on offer http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/...&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=358550147&pf_rd_i=468294

Any good?

I don't want anything too complicated. If I feel I can achieve something with a camera then I'll start looking into higher end consumer models once I got to grips with the basics.

What am I going to photograph...who knows :D I live in a nice part of the world so it could be mountains, wildlife, people...anything really.

Talk to me about macro lenses...I've been on the odd photo forum and the close up of bugs are quite amazing. Are these pricey? are 2nd hand lenses worth the gamble?

At some point I might buy a reasonable telescope (I live in the sticks so no light pollution...). Something that would be good at taking picture via a telescope would be good.

Ta!

That Canon 1100D looks like it fits your bill perfectly. It will have the important staples of DSLR photography for you to learn with at a reasonable entry price. If you eventually find a reason to buy a new camera then you can do so. Just be mindful of buying a more expensive body for no reason other than buying a new body. I've had three since mid 2006, first was a new D80, then about 2 years ago I upgraded to a used D7000 for better ISO performance, screen and some minor other bits. I now have a D7100, but only because my D7000 was stolen and this was the insurance replacement. I'll not buy another body now until I decide to get a full frame sensor, and only then when I decide that I need it for something.

As MilanoChris said, my only concern would be the size of the camera itself. I have large hands so the smaller models can feel a little cramped for me. Your best bet is to go to a local shop just to see how it feels.

Dedicated fixed length macros can help capture some stunning images, but on a budget I'd look at some extension tubes. I have a set even though I have a dedicated Macro lens as they can be used in tandem. They increase the distance from the rear of the lens to the sensor, and in so doing magnify your image without putting any other glass in the way. You can get a set of Meike tubes for probably £40-50. Be cautious of purchasing any tubes which have no electrical contacts, since you'll not be able to set your aperture on most lenses.

Here are some links to images I found on Flickr taken with a kit 18-55mm and some extension tubes to show you just what can be achieved. Last one is a Nikon camera, but still 18-55mm kit lens.

https://flic.kr/p/bybXPt - Spider
https://flic.kr/p/jWhX26 - Watch
https://flic.kr/p/9GghLd - Dandelion
https://flic.kr/p/8tRTaB - A cricket


47 views and no replies....that speaks volumes for this sub forum. Bet if I increased my budget to 4k people would be all over this like a rash.

Most of us dream of having such a budget. Your budget of £328/€400 is what will have made it difficult for people to help suggest other options for you.

I'm hoping to pick my first SLR up next month, currently not sure between the Nikon D5100 or the Canon 600D/650D

Nikon
-Cheapest!
-No OEM Battery Grips

Canon 600D
-Not really any cheaper than the 650D (2nd hand)
-OEM Battery Grip

Canon 650D
-Touch screen
-OEM Battery Grip
-Most expensive!

Performance wise they all seem to be pretty closely matched, with the Nikon edging it image quality wise. I do however plan to use mine a lot one camping, so the convenience of having 2 batteries in the grip really appeals! Also, whilst some will denounce the touch screen as a gimmick, a lot of the reviews seem to think it's genuinely quite a useful touch.

Have you touched either of them?

Canon and Nikon along with all the other brands make exceptional kit that will capture fantastic images. The deciding factors should be a) which one feels best in your hands, b) do you have friends with a brand that can assist or do swaps with, c) budget.

In your lists I see you have OEM Battery grips. Having had a genuine Nikon one for my D80, and a Meike one on my D7000 and D7100, I'd go for the Meike one time and time again. If I was getting a D800 (£2000) or a D610 (£1400) then I'd consider spending the extra on a Nikon grip. In the meantime, the choices are a £35 grip that works perfectly, feels great and does the job and from a brand I've used twice now, or a £230 Nikon one for my D7100.

As for having two batteries in the grip, I never found I needed them. Unless you are looking at every picture every night on your camera or using the onboard flash regularly, the battery could easily last you 800+ pics. I've had a grip for the ability to shoot portrait a little easier and the extra size it gives the body, as I said above I have large hands and the grip just gives me a little more to cling on with. Swapping a battery takes seconds and you should easily be able to get a huge number of pictures without needed to change at all.

Not really sure on your budget but to throw a cat among your pigeons, the D5200 with the 18-55 VRII lens is currently on sale for £469 after Nikon cashback from WEX, or £379 body only.

An excellent camera. Just like the others you've picked already!
 
Last edited:
abbotsmike said:
I'm hoping to pick my first SLR up next month, currently not sure between the Nikon D5100 or the Canon 600D/650D

Nikon
-Cheapest!
-No OEM Battery Grips

Canon 600D
-Not really any cheaper than the 650D (2nd hand)
-OEM Battery Grip

Canon 650D
-Touch screen
-OEM Battery Grip
-Most expensive!

Performance wise they all seem to be pretty closely matched, with the Nikon edging it image quality wise. I do however plan to use mine a lot one camping, so the convenience of having 2 batteries in the grip really appeals! Also, whilst some will denounce the touch screen as a gimmick, a lot of the reviews seem to think it's genuinely quite a useful touch.

Yeah no oem grip for the d5100 but there are good 3rd party ones, have one on mine. Cost just £25.
no way would I spend £260+ on an oem grip even if they made one for the d5100.
the grip on my d5100, it even matches the pattern on the d5100 perfectly



Posted from Overclockers.co.uk App for Android
 
Last edited:
Have you touched either of them?

Canon and Nikon along with all the other brands make exceptional kit that will capture fantastic images. The deciding factors should be a) which one feels best in your hands, b) do you have friends with a brand that can assist or do swaps with, c) budget.

In your lists I see you have OEM Battery grips. Having had a genuine Nikon one for my D80, and a Meike one on my D7000 and D7100, I'd go for the Meike one time and time again. If I was getting a D800 (£2000) or a D610 (£1400) then I'd consider spending the extra on a Nikon grip. In the meantime, the choices are a £35 grip that works perfectly, feels great and does the job and from a brand I've used twice now, or a £230 Nikon one for my D7100.

As for having two batteries in the grip, I never found I needed them. Unless you are looking at every picture every night on your camera or using the onboard flash regularly, the battery could easily last you 800+ pics. I've had a grip for the ability to shoot portrait a little easier and the extra size it gives the body, as I said above I have large hands and the grip just gives me a little more to cling on with. Swapping a battery takes seconds and you should easily be able to get a huge number of pictures without needed to change at all.

Not really sure on your budget but to throw a cat among your pigeons, the D5200 with the 18-55 VRII lens is currently on sale for £469 after Nikon cashback from WEX, or £379 body only.

An excellent camera. Just like the others you've picked already!

Had a brief play with them, currently suffering death by final year exams, so when I'm allowed out the house again I'll do some more 'in person' research! Budget wise I'm staying under £400 for a body+kit lens. Thev 5200 does appeal, but the extra price puts it out I'm afraid, I've already stretched myself to hit £400!!
I also like the idea of a battery grip for the handleability (is that a word?) reasons, but haven't had a chance to play with one, so I need to get myself to a proper camera shop. Fortunately when I'm back at work I won't be far from park cameras.
The only reason I point out the OEM grip is that the grips for the D5100 need a cable for the shutter release and don't have any of the dual controls on them.

And I'm 449 posts away from the MM!
 
Had a brief play with them, currently suffering death by final year exams, so when I'm allowed out the house again I'll do some more 'in person' research! Budget wise I'm staying under £400 for a body+kit lens. Thev 5200 does appeal, but the extra price puts it out I'm afraid, I've already stretched myself to hit £400!!
I also like the idea of a battery grip for the handleability (is that a word?) reasons, but haven't had a chance to play with one, so I need to get myself to a proper camera shop. Fortunately when I'm back at work I won't be far from park cameras.
The only reason I point out the OEM grip is that the grips for the D5100 need a cable for the shutter release and don't have any of the dual controls on them.

And I'm 449 posts away from the MM!

even if there was an oem grip for the d5100 it would still need the cable.
never needed to use the cable so its no problem.
 
even if there was an oem grip for the d5100 it would still need the cable.
never needed to use the cable so its no problem.

Do you just use it for the grippiness rather than the shutter release then?

My point was, if there was an OEM grip, Nikon would have designed the camera with a grip in mind, thus negating the need for a cable and building in the electrical contacts for a shutter release and exposure controls.
 
Do you just use it for the grippiness rather than the shutter release then?

My point was, if there was an OEM grip, Nikon would have designed the camera with a grip in mind, thus negating the need for a cable and building in the electrical contacts for a shutter release and exposure controls.

More to the point, for a starter DSLR why are you bothered about a v grip?
They add bulk and weight and until you get a big heavy lens you don't need a vgrip.
 
More to the point, for a starter DSLR why are you bothered about a v grip?
They add bulk and weight and until you get a big heavy lens you don't need a vgrip.

Odd, I thought not having my pinkie slide under my battery compartment and ease of portrait shooting were fairly valid reasons when I bought mine.
 
Odd, I thought not having my pinkie slide under my battery compartment and ease of portrait shooting were fairly valid reasons when I bought mine.

It is, the lower end DSLR's are too small for me as well. A grip also provides much better ergonomics for portrait shooting as you also note. For these two reasons I use a grip when needed, also for the extended battery life they also provide.
 
It is, the lower end DSLR's are too small for me as well. A grip also provides much better ergonomics for portrait shooting as you also note. For these two reasons I use a grip when needed, also for the extended battery life they also provide.

I never had any issues with my D90 or D70 before that, I only have average hands so I could see if you had giant hands the lower model could be uncomfortable but that just reinforces my point - if the camera is too small buy a bigger camera! Especially if you are willing to pay for an OEM grip that is worth as much as the camera is to begin with, just go up a model or 2!
 
Back
Top Bottom