Spielberg series sued for haircut

Le_Petit_Lapin · 20 Mar 2006 at 14:12

At most they should just pay for her to have hair extentions put in. There, good as new, and all that.

Spyhop · 20 Mar 2006 at 14:15

HEADRAT said:
Obviously Mr Ponce can quantify it:-

£142,000 for emotional distress
£43,000 in damages

he must be deeply religous

HEADRAT

LMAO. Indeed.

Psyk · 20 Mar 2006 at 14:45

Maybe the parents should have thought about it? Common sense says that if your child is going to star in a TV show, they might want to cut their hair. The parents should have realised this and told the directors or whatever that they can't do it. I bet there's something in the contract that they signed saying they were allowed to do it anyway.

pyro · 20 Mar 2006 at 14:46

Emotional distress? Oh my Lord they cut her hair, she should go on and kill herself now

JollyGreen said:
Yes because at aged 8 I'm sure all kids are absolutely sure of themselves and willing to oppose an adults will.

So it's not upto her to let her hair grow, if you think about it their parents are bad for making her not cut her hair good Mr. Spielberg came to the rescue

D4VE · 20 Mar 2006 at 14:50

£185k is a lot of money for such a low level of distress, what a joke! :mad:

Zip · 20 Mar 2006 at 15:02

Well this court case will CUT her film career short

Ill get my coat

Stretch · 20 Mar 2006 at 15:13

Zip said:
Well this court case will CUT her film career short

Ill get my coat

Groan, that's terrible