SSD - Power Consumption

Improves battery life, but not that significantly. I think roughly half an hour on my old nc10 for steady use.

It'll spend a lot less time accessing the drive, I think this is where the power saving comes in. A nice side effect is it turns on a lot quicker and feels far more responsive in use. SSDs in laptops are an excellent pairing. I used an ocz core v2 with mine.

edit: perhaps Mr Mad Rapper already has an ssd, and could move it into her laptop while getting himself a more exciting one? My desktop ssd will be going into my laptop when I get another one
 
I haven't got one, but will be buying one for my desktop PC when Windows 7 Home Edition arrives on pre-order! :)

What make and model would you recommend? I only need around 60GB or so for my desktop PC as it'll hold only the O/S and apps.
 
I'd recommend the vertex, though other people are going to suggest intel or crucial in the near future. The former is better and costs more, the latter is worse and costs less. There's quite a range out.

However for the wifes laptop, a second hand ocz solid series would be ideal and far cheaper. People do complain about stuttering. If I never noticed I don't think the lady will do.

I vote for ocz for a few reasons. Firstly they were one of the first on the scene, and I think deserve credit for the gamble. Second their aftersales support is exceptional, even down to regular firmware updates for their drives. Third, I've owned a core v2 and a vertex and loved both. However in a strictly cost per performance rating they lose out to a couple of other drives, most notably the crucials. The good ones are really excessive for a normal laptop, a 2ghz c2d just doesn't need a vertex. Solid series draw marginally less power than the top performers too. Core v1 = core v2 = solid series, near enough
 
Avoid the Core, Solid and Apex series due to potential stuttering and the fact that they are more expensive than the Crucials, which are far better drives. If you go OCZ (and they do have the best support) the Agility probably makes more sense than the Vertex. But the Crucial is by far the best bang for buck, once it gets back in stock. FYI, while the Intel is more expensive than the Vertex, that's because it comes in 80GB/160GB capacities rather than 60/120GB, and price per GB is actually cheaper for the Intel.
 
Crucial = Bang for Buck
OCZ Agility = Midrange, Slightly expensive
Intel = Pure Performance, expensive (cheaper per GB as stated above)
 
i have 3 ocz agility with a 60gb for the os and two 30gb drives in raid0 the performance is excellent on both drives and the raid0 setup is noticably faster
Ocz has better firmware and support than crucial
win7 would be the preferred os because it supports trim
if using any other os wiper tool is available for ocz drives
 
Price per GB (format capacity aside), Crucial win by a long way.

M225 64GB £108 £1.68/GB
M225 128GB £210 £1.64/GB
M225 256GB £380 £1.48/GB
Intel X25-M 80GB £172 £2.15/GB
Intel X25-M 160GB £340 £2.13/GB

Wiper works on any Barefoot drive including Crucial. Crucial's warranty is much longer than the others and RMA's are very good. The latest firmware came a few days later to Crucial than the other Indilinx drives, but its a new product to them and a few days is nothing. As for day to day use I don't believe you could tell the difference between an Intel and a Indilinx barefoot drive.
 
Back
Top Bottom