Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 12,050
- Location
- Manchester
I had my eye on that one, I think those are the best looking seats. Not a fan of full leather as they're a bit slippy and can make your back sweaty.
There aren't any, at least not ones worth buying, believe me I just spent months looking. A few things get said in here that in reality just aren't true.http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classif...ywords/st220/page/1/postcode/rh13ly?logcode=p
Theres this one also, however its 67k miles and seems overpriced again!
Ffs wheres all these 5k 2005 ST220s Fox is always talking about!
Finding a mint 5 year old ST220 for decent money is a nightmare. I ended up giving up in the end, so sick of "immaculate" meaning it was just unwashed to try and hide all the scratchesJust went to look at one with the sat nav and all that, why do people advertise cars with immaculate paintwork and panels when they are covered with small scratchs and a few dings?
Other than that it was so weird to drive, gearbox changes are really long compared to the S2000! Ride wasnt as smooth as I expected either, more sporty over the bumps.
Onwards with the search!

I looked at several and all off them had iffy paintwork.
Be wary of the clutch and DMF as it will cost you around £1k to fix if it goes wrong. Most of them suffer with the sagging rear bumper which looks terrible. Scabby alloys are a problem you'll get with most and listen out for worn rear bushes one 60k milers that haven't had them replaced yet, that's a £300 job aswell.




