Arcade Fire said:I think that believing in God is more plausible than believing in astrology.
So do you belive in god then?
Arcade Fire said:I think that believing in God is more plausible than believing in astrology.
I'm agnostic.ElRazur said:So do you belive in god then?
Arcade Fire said:I'm agnostic.
The term agnostic is also used to describe those who are unconvinced or noncommittal about the existence of deities as well as about other matters of religion.
Talk about splitting hairs.ElRazur said:Where do you stand, unconvinced or non-committal?
In the middle of those two.ElRazur said:Where do you stand, unconvinced or non-committal?
I believe that it's impossible to ever have certain knowledge about the existence of entities that don't impact on the physical, measurable world.ElRazur said:Where do you stand, unconvinced or non-committal?
Arcade Fire said:I believe that it's impossible to ever have certain knowledge about the existence of entities that don't impact on the physical, measurable world.
Strong agnosticism (also called hard agnosticism, closed agnosticism, strict agnosticism, absolute agnosticism)—the view that the question of the existence or nonexistence of god(s) are unknowable by nature or that human beings are ill-equipped to judge the evidence.
Not true. The existence of God is not scientifically testable. Astrology, on the other hand, makes predictions as to what the future will be like. We can test those predictions (by e.g. comparing them to similar, but completely made up predictions) and if the astrologer's predictions don't perform any better than some random crap that I just made up (and they don't) then that's good evidence that astrology is a load of nonsense.ElRazur said:I think if you dismiss astrology and star signs but think or have thinking along the lines of god might possibly exist then astrology shouldnt be fully dismissed.
Arcade Fire said:Not true. The existence of God is not scientifically testable. Astrology, on the other hand, makes predictions as to what the future will be like. We can test those predictions (by e.g. comparing them to similar, but completely made up predictions) and if the astrologer's predictions don't perform any better than some random crap that I just made up (and they don't) then that's good evidence that astrology is a load of nonsense.
dmpoole said:Reading star signs is for girls and gays - what are you El Razur![]()
ElRazur said:A guitar swinging, rock hero!![]()
![]()
Garp said:I'm curious when you're going to answer my comments about Astrology, particularly I'm very interested how on earth a star millions of years dead has any impact on my life today?
Yes, I actually doElRazur said:Star signs...Do you belive in them?
Life experienceArcade Fire said:What makes you think that?